Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39043679›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2024

Understanding mechanisms of generalization following locomotor adaptation.

Cristina Rossi, Ryan T Roemmich, Amy J Bastian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristina RossiDepartment of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Ryan T RoemmichCenter for Movement Studies, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Amy J BastianDepartment of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. bastian@kennedykrieger.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6079-0997

Funding

Human Locomotor Plasticity in Health and DiseaseR37NS090610 · NINDS · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI BASTIAN, AMY J. · 2015 to 2020
$3.3M
American Heart Association (American Heart Association, Inc.) 20PRE35180131NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS090610U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) 5 R37 NS090610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our nervous system has the remarkable ability to adapt our gait to accommodate changes in our body or surroundings. However, our adapted walking patterns often generalize only partially (or not at all) between different contexts. Here, we sought to understand how the nervous system generalizes adapted gait patterns from one context to another. Through a series of split-belt treadmill walking experiments, we evaluated different mechanistic hypotheses to explain the partial generalization of adapted gait patterns from split-belt treadmill to overground walking. In support of the credit assignment hypothesis, our experiments revealed the central finding that adaptation involves recalibration of two distinct forward models. Recalibration of the first model generalizes to overground walking, suggesting that the model represents the general movement dynamics of our body. On the other hand, recalibration of the second model does not generalize to overground walking, suggesting the model represents dynamics specific to treadmill walking. These findings reveal that there is a predefined portion of forward model recalibration that generalizes across context, leading to overall partial generalization of walking adaptation.

Identifiers

PMID39043679
PMCPMC11266392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.