Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39043590›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Qualitative interview with mothers of moderately or late preterm infants in the UK: where are the care gaps?

Catherine Laverty, Andrew Surtees, Daniel Sutherland, Caroline Richards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catherine LavertyUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK c.laverty@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1101-3942
Andrew SurteesUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Daniel SutherlandUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Caroline RichardsUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5444-4147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreterm birth (<37 gestational weeks) accounts for an increasing proportion of global births each year, with moderately or late preterm birth (MLPT) (32

methodsSix mothers from the UK of infants (aged between 18 and 36 months) born MLPT were invited to take part in a semistructured qualitative interview study. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed to explore the data and codes were then conceptualised through a process of inductive reasoning to identify patterns of meaning.

resultsFive themes are presented that are conceptualised from the data: (1) the moderate or later preterm 'label-does it matter?, (2) vulnerability within a new role, (3) coming home and wanting to start 'normal' life, (4) comparisons to provide a reference to experiences and (5) experience of professionals throughout the pregnancy, newborn and early years journey.

conclusionsFindings offer in-depth evidence surrounding mothers' experiences of healthcare throughout pregnancy and immediately after birth, perceptions of the 'preterm' label and thoughts on how mothers reflect on their experiences. Future research should show an awareness of the broader family context when interpreting findings and providing suggestions for future research avenues or service provision.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureMothersQualitative ResearchAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicPregnancyPremature BirthUnited Kingdomcommunity child healthpostpartum periodpregnant womenprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID39043590
PMCPMC11268029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.