ReviewPathogens and disease2024
Advances in vaccine development for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Review in Pathogens and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the potential health and economic impacts of chlamydia vaccination strategies in the United States: a mathematical modeling and cost-effectiveness simulation study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Article
- Computational design of a novel chimeric multi-epitope vaccine against chlamydia trachomatis serovar a to prevent trachoma.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- Pathogenicity and virulence ofVirulence · 2025Review
- UnveilingiScience · 2025Article
- Study Models forMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- Article
- Could APTIMA mRNA Assay Contribute to Predicting Cervical Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Co-Infections? A Colposcopy Population Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Immunity to Sexually Transmitted Bacterial Infections of the Female Genital Tract: Toward Effective Vaccines.Vaccines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chlamydia trachomatis is the most prevalent bacterial sexually transmitted infection globally. Antibiotic treatment is highly effective, but infection is often asymptomatic resulting in most individuals going undetected and untreated. This untreated infection can ascend to the upper female genital tract to cause pelvic inflammatory disease, tubal factor infertility, and ectopic pregnancy. Chlamydia screening and treatment programs have failed to control this epidemic and demonstrate the need for an efficacious vaccine to prevent transmission and disease. Animal models and human epidemiological data reveal that natural immunity can provide partial or short-lived sterilizing immunity. These data further demonstrate the importance of eliciting interferon gamma (IFNγ)-producing cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) T cells (Th1 and Th1/17 cells) that can likely synergize with antibody-mediated opsonophagocytosis to provide optimal protection. These studies have guided preclinical rational vaccine design for decades and the first Phase 1 clinical trials have recently been completed. Recent advances have led to improvements in vaccine platforms and clinically safe adjuvants that help provide a path forward. This review describes vaccine models, correlates of immunity, antigen and adjuvant selection, and future clinical testing for Chlamydia vaccine development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.