ArticleWorld journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery2024
Common Arterial Trunk Repair at the Red Cross War Memorial Hospital, Cape Town: A 20-Year Review of Surgical Practice and Outcomes.
Article in World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study describes the 20-year experience of managing common arterial trunk (CAT) in a low-and-middle-income country and compares the early and medium-term outcomes following the transition from conduit to nonconduit repair at the Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital.
methodsSingle-center retrospective study of consecutive patients aged less than 18 years who underwent repair of CAT from January 1999 to December 2018 at the Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital. Patients with interrupted aortic arch or previous pulmonary artery banding were excluded.
resultsFifty-four patients had CAT repair during the study period. Thirty-four (63.0%) patients had a conduit repair, and 20 (37.0%) patients had a nonconduit repair. There were two intraoperative deaths. Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 22.2% (12/54). Overall, in-hospital mortality was 29.6% (16/54). Eight (21.1%) late mortalities were observed. The actuarial survival for the conduit group was 77.5%, 53.4%, and 44.5% at 6, 12, and 27 months, respectively, and the nonconduit group was 58.6% at six months. The overall freedom from reoperation between the conduit group and nonconduit group was 66.2% versus 86.5%, 66.2% versus 76.9%, and 29.8% versus 64.1% at 1, 2, and 8 years, respectively.
conclusionsThe outcomes following the transition to nonconduit repair for CAT in a low- and middle-income setting appear to be encouraging. There was no difference in mortality between conduit and nonconduit repairs, and importantly the results suggest a trend toward lower reintervention rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.