Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39043187›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2024

Plasticity of the mitotic spindle in response to karyotype variation.

Preethi Kunchala, Joseph M Varberg, Eileen O'Toole, Jennifer Gardner, Sarah E Smith, Melainia McClain, Sue L Jaspersen, R Scott Hawley, Jennifer L Gerton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Preethi KunchalaStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA; Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. Electronic address: pkunchala@stowers.org.
Joseph M VarbergStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Eileen O'TooleDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80302, USA.
Jennifer GardnerStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Sarah E SmithStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Melainia McClainStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Sue L JaspersenStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
R Scott HawleyStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA; Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Jennifer L GertonStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. Electronic address: jeg@stowers.org.

Funding

Maintaining the integrity of a genomeR01CA266339 · NCI · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI JENNIFER L GERTON · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
Assembly and Regulation of Yeast Spindle PolesR01GM121443 · NIGMS · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI GERTON, JENNIFER L · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA266339NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Karyotypes, composed of chromosomes, must be accurately partitioned by the mitotic spindle for optimal cell health. However, it is unknown how underlying characteristics of karyotypes, such as chromosome number and size, govern the scaling of the mitotic spindle to ensure accurate chromosome segregation and cell proliferation. We utilize budding yeast strains engineered with fewer chromosomes, including just two "mega chromosomes," to study how spindle size and function are responsive to, and scaled by, karyotype. We determined that deletion and overexpression of spindle-related genes are detrimental to the growth of strains with two chromosomes, suggesting that mega chromosomes exert altered demands on the spindle. Using confocal microscopy, we demonstrate that cells with fewer but longer chromosomes have smaller spindle pole bodies, fewer microtubules, and longer spindles. Moreover, using electron tomography and confocal imaging, we observe elongated, bent anaphase spindles with fewer core microtubules in strains with mega chromosomes. Cells harboring mega chromosomes grow more slowly, are delayed in mitosis, and a subset struggle to complete chromosome segregation. We propose that the karyotype of the cell dictates the microtubule number, type, spindle pole body size, and spindle length, subsequently influencing the dynamics of mitosis, such as the rate of spindle elongation and the velocity of pole separation. Taken together, our results suggest that mitotic spindles are highly plastic ultrastructures that can accommodate and adjust to a variety of karyotypes, even within a species.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSpindle ApparatusChromosome SegregationChromosomes, FungalKaryotypeMicrotubulesMitosisanaphasecentromerechromosomechromosome segregationchromosome sizekaryotypemetaphasemicrotubulemitosisspindlespindle pole bodytomography

Identifiers

PMID39043187
PMCPMC11333012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.