ArticleCerebrovascular diseases extra2024
Hub-and-Spoke Stroke System: Enhancing Acute Ischemic Stroke Care in the Philippines.
Article in Cerebrovascular diseases extra, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can safety and innovation coexist in the global expansion of laser balloon ablation?Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- A Multi-Sector Mixed Methods Study of Stroke Services in the Philippines: Insights From Government Officials and Organisational Leaders.The International journal of health planning and management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Hub-and-Spoke stroke system seeks to enhance the efficiency of stroke care by establishing a cohesive network between healthcare facilities providing quality stroke care to patients. This study endeavors to evaluate the effectiveness and characterize the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients treated within the Hub-and-Spoke hospital system over 2 years. The assessment focused on thrombolysis rates, mortality, and disability at 3-month follow-up.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective single-center review to assess the service delivery and outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients within the Hub-and-Spoke framework which was implemented in Q3 2021. The Hub-and-Spoke model aimed to provide appropriate neurological care for stroke patients, growing from four to eight spoke hospitals in 2 years.
resultsThe study consisted of 132 stroke patients transferred to the hub hospital, and 42 (31.8%) of them had acute ischemic stroke. Among these 42 ischemic stroke patients, 76% of them were candidates for thrombolysis with a mean NIHSS of 12 (6-22). Among the subset of 32 patients eligible for intervention within the specified time window, a total of 23 individuals, constituting 72% received r-TPA. Regarding patients administered r-TPA, 91.2% demonstrated favorable functional outcomes with an mRS score of 0-1, while 8.7% exhibited a score of 2-3. Among those not given r-TPA, the mean NIHSS was 17 (ranging from 2 to 32). Their functional outcomes after 3 months revealed 52.5% with an mRS score of 0-1, 16% with a score of 2-3, 21.2% with a score of 4-5, and 10.5% with an mRS score of 6.
conclusionHub-and-Spoke networks represent a crucial advancement in stroke treatment, particularly for facilities lacking the capacity to manage strokes effectively. By leveraging added expertise and reducing the time from onset to diagnosis to treatment, these networks have significantly enhanced patient care. This enhancement is particularly evident in the increased rate of thrombolysis, resulting in reduced morbidity and prevention of mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.