Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39043043›Full record

ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Male Breast Cancer: Current Scenario and Future Perspectives.

Anitha Chidambaram, Rajkumar Prabhakaran, Sivabalan Sivasamy, Thanigaivelan Kanagasabai, Malarvili Thekkumalai, Ankit Singh, Mayurika S Tyagi, Sivanesan Dhandayuthapani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hotspots and future trends of male breast cancer: a global perspective.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anitha ChidambaramDepartment of Biochemistry, PRIST Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, TN, India.
Rajkumar PrabhakaranCentral Research Facility, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, UP, India.
Sivabalan SivasamyCentral Research Facility, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, UP, India.
Thanigaivelan KanagasabaiDepartment of Biochemistry, Cancer Biology, Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA.
Malarvili ThekkumalaiDepartment of Biochemistry, Center for Distance Education, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, TN, India.
Ankit SinghDepartment of Community Medicine, United Institute of Medical Sciences, Prayagraj, UP, India.
Mayurika S TyagiDepartment of Immuno Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, UP, India.
Sivanesan DhandayuthapaniCentral Research Facility, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, UP, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2017-2980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male breast cancer (MBC), one of the rare types of cancer among men where the global incidence rate is 1.8% of all breast cancers cases with a yearly increase in a pace of 1.1%. Since the last 10 years, the incidence has been increased from 7.2% to 10.3% and the mortality rate was decreased from 11% to 3.8%. Nevertheless, the rate of diagnoses has been expected to be around 2.6% in the near future, still there is a great lack in studies to characterize the MBC including the developed countries. Based on our search, it is evidenced from the literature that the number of risk factors for the cause of MBC are significant, which includes the increase in age, family genetic history, mutations in specific genes due to various environmental impacts, hormonal imbalance and unregulated expression receptors for specific hormones of high levels of estrogen or androgen receptors compared to females. MBCs are broadly classified into ductal and lobular carcinomas with further sub-types, with some of the symptoms including a lump or swelling in the breast, redness of flaky skin in the breast, irritation and nipple discharge that is similar to the female breast cancer (FBC). The most common diagnostic tools currently in use are the ultrasound guided sonography, mammography, and biopsies. Treatment modalities for MBC include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and targeted therapies. However, the guidelines followed for the diagnosis and treatment modalities of MBC are mostly based on FBC that is due to the lack of prospective studies related to MBC. However, there are distinct clinical and molecular features of MBC, it is a need to develop different clinical methods with more multinational approaches to help oncologist to improve care for MBC patients.

Indexed as

Breast Neoplasms, MaleFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleRisk Factorsdiagnosis of MBCepidemiologymale breast cancerrisk factorstreatment modalities

Identifiers

PMID39043043
PMCPMC11271170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.