Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39042846›Full record

Observational studyNeurology2024

Graded Multidimensional Clinical and Radiologic Variation in Patients With Alzheimer Disease and Posterior Cortical Atrophy.

Ruth U Ingram, Dilek Ocal, Ajay Halai, Gorana Pobric, David M Cash, Sebastian Crutch, Keir X Yong, Matthew A Lambon Ralph

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruth U IngramFrom the Division of Psychology and Mental Health (R.U.I., G.P.), University of Manchester; Dementia Research Centre (D.O., D.M.C., S.C., K.X.Y.), UCL Institute of Neurology, London; and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (A.H., M.A.L.R.), University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Dilek OcalFrom the Division of Psychology and Mental Health (R.U.I., G.P.), University of Manchester; Dementia Research Centre (D.O., D.M.C., S.C., K.X.Y.), UCL Institute of Neurology, London; and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (A.H., M.A.L.R.), University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0934-1613
Ajay HalaiFrom the Division of Psychology and Mental Health (R.U.I., G.P.), University of Manchester; Dementia Research Centre (D.O., D.M.C., S.C., K.X.Y.), UCL Institute of Neurology, London; and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (A.H., M.A.L.R.), University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Gorana PobricFrom the Division of Psychology and Mental Health (R.U.I., G.P.), University of Manchester; Dementia Research Centre (D.O., D.M.C., S.C., K.X.Y.), UCL Institute of Neurology, London; and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (A.H., M.A.L.R.), University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
David M CashFrom the Division of Psychology and Mental Health (R.U.I., G.P.), University of Manchester; Dementia Research Centre (D.O., D.M.C., S.C., K.X.Y.), UCL Institute of Neurology, London; and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (A.H., M.A.L.R.), University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7833-616X
Sebastian CrutchFrom the Division of Psychology and Mental Health (R.U.I., G.P.), University of Manchester; Dementia Research Centre (D.O., D.M.C., S.C., K.X.Y.), UCL Institute of Neurology, London; and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (A.H., M.A.L.R.), University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Keir X YongFrom the Division of Psychology and Mental Health (R.U.I., G.P.), University of Manchester; Dementia Research Centre (D.O., D.M.C., S.C., K.X.Y.), UCL Institute of Neurology, London; and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (A.H., M.A.L.R.), University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-3599
Matthew A Lambon RalphFrom the Division of Psychology and Mental Health (R.U.I., G.P.), University of Manchester; Dementia Research Centre (D.O., D.M.C., S.C., K.X.Y.), UCL Institute of Neurology, London; and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (A.H., M.A.L.R.), University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-2488

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/18Medical Research Council MR/V031481/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAlzheimer disease (AD) spans heterogeneous typical and atypical phenotypes. Posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is a striking example, characterized by prominent impairment in visual and other posterior functions in contrast to typical, amnestic AD. The primary study objective was to establish how the similarities and differences of cognition and brain volumes within AD and PCA (and by extension other AD variants) can be conceptualized as systematic variations across a transdiagnostic, graded multidimensional space.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional, single-center, observational, cohort study performed at the National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom. Data were collected from a cohort of patients with PCA and AD, matched for age, disease duration, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. There were 2 sets of outcome measures: (1) scores on a neuropsychological battery containing 22 tests spanning visuoperceptual and visuospatial processing, episodic memory, language, executive functions, calculation, and visuospatial processing and (2) measures extracted from high-resolution T1-weighted volumetric MRI scans. Principal component analysis was used to extract the transdiagnostic dimensions of phenotypical variation from the detailed neuropsychological data. Voxel-based morphometry was used to examine associations between the PCA-derived clinical phenotypes and the structural measures.

resultsWe enrolled 93 participants with PCA (mean: age = 59.9 years, MMSE = 21.2; 59/93 female) and 58 AD participants (mean: age = 57.1 years, MMSE = 19.7; 22/58 female). The principal component analysis for PCA (sample adequacy confirmed: Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.865) extracted 3 dimensions accounting for 61.0% of variance in patients' performance, reflecting general cognitive impairment, visuoperceptual deficits, and visuospatial impairments. Plotting AD cases into the PCA-derived multidimensional space, and vice versa, revealed graded, overlapping variations between cases along these dimensions, with no evidence for categorical-like patient clustering. Similarly, the relationship between brain volumes and scores on the extracted dimensions was overlapping for PCA and AD cases. DISCUSSION: These results provide evidence supporting a reconceptualization of clinical and radiologic variation in these heterogenous AD phenotypes as being along shared phenotypic continua spanning PCA and AD, arising from systematic graded variations within a transdiagnostic, multidimensional neurocognitive geometry.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAtrophyMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuropsychological TestsAgedCerebral CortexCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39042846
PMCPMC11314952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.