Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39042830›Full record

ReviewACS applied materials & interfaces2024

Current Challenges in Microcapsule Designs and Microencapsulation Processes: A Review.

Benjamin T Lobel, Daniele Baiocco, Mohammed Al-Sharabi, Alexander F Routh, Zhibing Zhang, Olivier J Cayre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biocontrol of pistachio gummosis using encapsulated Pseudomonas chlororaphis VUPF5.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin T LobelSchool of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Woodhouse LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0472-6362
Daniele BaioccoSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Mohammed Al-SharabiDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0AS, United Kingdom.
Alexander F RouthDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0AS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3443-3053
Zhibing ZhangSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2797-9098
Olivier J CayreSchool of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Woodhouse LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1339-3686

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microencapsulation is an advanced methodology for the protection, preservation, and/or delivery of active materials in a wide range of industrial sectors, such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, fragrances, paints, coatings, detergents, food products, and agrochemicals. Polymeric materials have been extensively used as microcapsule shells to provide appropriate barrier properties to achieve controlled release of the encapsulated active ingredient. However, significant limitations are associated with such capsules, including undesired leaching and the nonbiodegradable nature of the typically used polymers. In addition, the energy cost of manufacturing microcapsules is an important factor to be considered when designing microcapsule systems and the corresponding production processes. Recent factors linked to UN sustainability goals are modifying how such microencapsulation systems should be designed in pursuit of "ideal" microcapsules that are efficient, safe, cost-effective and environmentally friendly. This review provides an overview of advances in microencapsulation, with emphasis on sustainable microcapsule designs. The key evaluation techniques to assess the biodegradability of microcapsules, in compliance with recently evolving European Union requirements, are also described. Moreover, the most common methodologies for the fabrication of microcapsules are presented within the framework of their energy demand. Recent promising microcapsule designs are also highlighted for their suitability toward meeting current design requirements and stringent regulations, tackling the ongoing challenges, limitations, and opportunities.

Indexed as

CapsulesDrug CompoundingPolymersCapsulesPolymersactive ingredient deliverymicrocapsule fabricationmicroencapsulationsustainable microcapsule design

Identifiers

PMID39042830
PMCPMC11311140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.