Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39042660›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Integration of machine learning XGBoost and SHAP models for NBA game outcome prediction and quantitative analysis methodology.

Yan Ouyang, Xuewei Li, Wenjia Zhou, Wei Hong, Weitao Zheng, Feng Qi, Liming Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yan OuyangSchool of Intelligent Sports Engineering, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-5145-5585
Xuewei LiSchool of Intelligent Sports Engineering, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Wenjia ZhouSchool of Intelligent Sports Engineering, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-4984
Wei HongSchool of Intelligent Sports Engineering, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Weitao ZhengSchool of Intelligent Sports Engineering, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Feng QiSchool of Intelligent Sports Engineering, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Liming PengKey Laboratory of Sports Engineering of General Administration of Sport of China, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-8098-4646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the application of artificial intelligence in real-time prediction of professional basketball games, identifying the variations within performance indicators that are critical in determining the outcomes of the games. Utilizing games data from the NBA seasons 2021 to 2023 as the sample, the study constructed a real-time predictive model for NBA game outcomes, integrating the machine learning XGBoost and SHAP algorithms. The model simulated the prediction of game outcomes at different time of games and effectively quantified the analysis of key factors that influenced game outcomes. The study's results demonstrated that the XGBoost algorithm was highly effective in predicting NBA game outcomes. Key performance indicators such as field goal percentage, defensive rebounds, and turnovers were consistently related to the outcomes at all times during the game. In the first half of the game, assists were a key indicator affecting the outcome of the game. In the second half of the games, offensive rebounds and three-point shooting percentage were key indicators affecting the outcome of the games. The performance of the real-time prediction model for NBA game outcomes, which integrates machine learning XGBoost and SHAP algorithms, is found to be excellent and highly interpretable. By quantifying the factors that determine victory, it is able to provide significant decision support for coaches in arranging tactical strategies on the court. Moreover, the study provides reliable data references for sports bettors, athletes, club managers, and sponsors.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAthletic PerformanceBasketballMachine LearningHumans

Identifiers

PMID39042660
PMCPMC11265715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.