ArticlePloS one2024
Integration of machine learning XGBoost and SHAP models for NBA game outcome prediction and quantitative analysis methodology.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of an individualized prediction model for dynamic adaptations in performance and immune function associated with dietary patterns in endurance athletes using machine learning.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026Observational
- Winning beyond scoring: an explainable machine learning framework for identifying key performance indicators in the Chinese Basketball Association.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Dual-target modeling of team performance using regularized regression with expanding-window rolling validation and engineered feature ablation: methodological insights for small-sample digital public health analytics.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Stacked ensemble model for NBA game outcome prediction analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Explaining basketball game performance with SHAP: insights from Chinese Basketball Association.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identification of Athleticism and Sports Profiles Throughout Machine Learning Applied to Heart Rate Variability.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A deep learning-based study of player styles and cross-league performance adaptation mechanisms: a case study of the NBA and CBA.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Positional contrasts in key techniques between men's and women's basketball at the Olympic level.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the application of artificial intelligence in real-time prediction of professional basketball games, identifying the variations within performance indicators that are critical in determining the outcomes of the games. Utilizing games data from the NBA seasons 2021 to 2023 as the sample, the study constructed a real-time predictive model for NBA game outcomes, integrating the machine learning XGBoost and SHAP algorithms. The model simulated the prediction of game outcomes at different time of games and effectively quantified the analysis of key factors that influenced game outcomes. The study's results demonstrated that the XGBoost algorithm was highly effective in predicting NBA game outcomes. Key performance indicators such as field goal percentage, defensive rebounds, and turnovers were consistently related to the outcomes at all times during the game. In the first half of the game, assists were a key indicator affecting the outcome of the game. In the second half of the games, offensive rebounds and three-point shooting percentage were key indicators affecting the outcome of the games. The performance of the real-time prediction model for NBA game outcomes, which integrates machine learning XGBoost and SHAP algorithms, is found to be excellent and highly interpretable. By quantifying the factors that determine victory, it is able to provide significant decision support for coaches in arranging tactical strategies on the court. Moreover, the study provides reliable data references for sports bettors, athletes, club managers, and sponsors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.