ArticlePloS one2024
Quantitative CT lung volumetry and densitometry in pediatric pectus excavatum.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pectus deformities in children: a pictorial review.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Computed tomography features associated with pneumothorax susceptibility in pectus excavatum: a retrospective case-control study of lobar morphometry, attenuation metrics, and machine-learning projection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Sternal advancement surgery for pectus excavatum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiac and respiratory function outcomes.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quantitative computed tomography (CT) volumetry and densitometry and in pediatric patients with pectus excavatum (PE). We measured pectus index (PI) and separated inspiratory and expiratory lung volumes and densities. We obtained the total lung volume (TLV) and mean lung density (MLD) during inspiration and expiration, and the ratio of end expiratory to inspiratory volume (E/I volume) and MLD (E/I density) were calculated. The difference between inspiratory and end expiratory volume (I-E volume) and MLD (I-E density) were also calculated. A total of 199 patients, including 164 PE patients and 35 controls, were included in this study. The result shows that the PE group had lower inspiratory TLV (mean, 2670.76±1364.22 ml) than the control group (3219.57±1313.87 ml; p = 0.027). In the PE group, the inspiratory (-787.21±52.27 HU vs. -804.94±63.3 HU) and expiratory MLD (-704.51±55.41 HU vs. -675.83±64.62 HU) were significantly lower than the indices obtained from the control group (p = 0.006). In addition, significantly lower values of TLV and MLD difference and higher value of TLV and MLD ratio were found in the PE group (p <0.0001). PE patients were divided into severe vs. mild groups based on the PI cutoff value of 3.5. The inspiratory MLD and TLV ratio in the severe PE group were lower than those in the mild PE group, respectively (p <0.05). In conclusion, quantitative pulmonary evaluation through CT in pediatric PE patients may provide further information in assessing the functional changes in lung parenchyma as a result of chest wall deformity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.