Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39042628›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Application and comparison of point-of-care devices for field evaluation of underlying health status of Guatemalan sugarcane workers.

Lyndsay Krisher, Diana Jaramillo, Amy Dye-Robinson, Miranda Dally, Jaime Butler-Dawson, Stephen Brindley, Daniel Pilloni, Alex Cruz, Karely Villarreal Hernandez, Joshua Schaeffer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lyndsay KrisherCenter for Health, Work & Environment, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7142-380X
Diana JaramilloCenter for Health, Work & Environment, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3257-2366
Amy Dye-RobinsonCenter for Health, Work & Environment, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Miranda DallyCenter for Health, Work & Environment, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Jaime Butler-DawsonCenter for Health, Work & Environment, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Stephen BrindleyCenter for Health, Work & Environment, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Daniel PilloniGrupo Pantaleon, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Alex CruzGrupo Pantaleon, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Karely Villarreal HernandezCenter for Health, Work & Environment, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9917-8903
Joshua SchaefferDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3367-4696
John L AdgateCenter for Health, Work & Environment, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Lee S NewmanCenter for Health, Work & Environment, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8067-1159

Funding

Particulate exposure and kidney health: Diversity Supplement Villarreal HernandezR01ES031585 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI JOHN L. ADGATE, LEE S NEWMAN · 2021 to 2026
$3.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES031585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With chronic disease prevalence on the rise globally, surveillance and monitoring are critical to improving health outcomes. Point-of-care (POC) testing can facilitate epidemiological research and enhance surveillance systems in limited resource settings, but previous research has identified bias between POC devices and laboratory testing. We compared the performance of two POC blood analyzers, the iSTAT handheld (Abbott, Princeton, NJ, USA) and the StatSensor Creatinine (Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA, USA) to concurrent blood samples analyzed at a local laboratory that were collected from 89 agricultural workers in Guatemala. We measured creatinine and other measures of underlying health status with the POC and the lab blood samples. Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, no intercept linear regression models and two-sample t-tests were used to evaluate the agreement between the POC and lab values collected across three study days and to assess differences by study day in a field setting. On average there was no observed difference between the iSTAT and lab creatinine measurements (p = 0.91), regardless of study day. Using lab creatinine as the gold standard, iSTAT creatinine results were more accurate compared to the Statsensor, which showed some bias, especially at higher values. The iSTAT had good agreement with the lab for sodium and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), but showed differences for potassium, anion gap, bicarbonate (TCO2), glucose, and hematocrit. In this tropical field setting, the research team devised a protocol to prevent the devices from overheating. In limited resource settings, POC devices carry advantages compared to traditional lab analyses, providing timely results to patients, researchers, and healthcare systems to better evaluate chronic health conditions. Technical challenges due to use of POC devices in high heat and humidity environments can be addressed using a standard protocol for transporting and operating the devices.

Identifiers

PMID39042628
PMCPMC11265697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.