Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39042627›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2024

Six-year follow-up of participants in two clinical trials of rituximab or cyclophosphamide in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

Ingrid G Rekeland, Kari Sørland, Lisbeth Lykke Neteland, Alexander Fosså, Kine Alme, Kristin Risa, Olav Dahl, Karl J Tronstad, Olav Mella, Øystein Fluge

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ingrid G RekelandDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2923-8656
Kari SørlandDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Lisbeth Lykke NetelandDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Alexander FossåDepartment of Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kine AlmeDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Kristin RisaDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Olav DahlDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Karl J TronstadDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Olav MellaDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Øystein FlugeDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this six-year follow-up study, we used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to compare values at baseline, at 18 months, and at six-year follow up from the CycloME and the RituxME trials.

methodsBased on the hypothesis that ME/CFS in a subgroup of patients is a variant of an autoimmune disease, we performed two clinical trials between 2014 and 2017. The RituxME trial was a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled phase III trial of 151 patients, assessing the B-cell depleting antibody rituximab. The CycloME trial was an open-label phase II trial of 40 patients using intravenous cyclophosphamide. Here we report six-year follow-up from both trials, using the Short Form 36 Physical Function (SF-36 PF) and DePaul short form (DSQ-SF) questionnaires.

resultOf the patients available after six years, 75.7% of RituxME and 94.4% of CycloME patients participated. In the RituxME rituximab group, the mean SF-36 PF scores were 32.9 at baseline, 42.4 at 18 months and 45.5 at six years. In the placebo group, the mean SF-36 PF scores were 32.3 at baseline, 45.5 at 18 months and 43.1 at six years. In the CycloME trial, mean SF-36 PF increased from 35.4 at baseline to 54.4 at 18 months, and 56.7 at six years. At six-year follow-up, 44.1% of cyclophosphamide-, 27.6% of rituximab- and 20.4% of placebo-treated patients had an SF-36 PF ≥ 70, and further, 17.6%, 8.6% and 7.4% of the corresponding patient groups had an SF-36 PF ≥ 90, which is within normal range. In terms of worsening at six years, 5.9% of cyclophosphamide-treated, 10.3% of rituximab-, and 14.8% of placebo-treated patients had a drop in SF-36 PF of 20 points or more from baseline. There were no serious unexpected adverse reactions.

conclusionsAfter six years, 44.1% of the cyclophosphamide group scored an SF-36 PF of at least 70, and 17.6% of at least 90, suggesting that cyclophosphamide in a subgroup may modulate the disease course in a beneficial way. However, cyclophosphamide carries toxicity concerns and should not be used for ME/CFS patients outside clinical trials. Rather, these data should encourage efforts to better understand the disease mechanisms and to search for targeted and less toxic immune modulatory treatment for this patient group.

Indexed as

CyclophosphamideFatigue Syndrome, ChronicRituximabAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTreatment OutcomeCyclophosphamideRituximab

Identifiers

PMID39042627
PMCPMC11265720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.