Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39042567›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2024

Knowledge, attitude and practice related to anthrax among livestock farmers in West Kazakhstan.

Altyn Kulpiisova, Zukhra Aitpayeva, Assiya Maimatayeva, Lyailya Ussenova, Assel Paritova, Assylbek Zhanabayev, Temirlan Bakishev, Spandiyar Tursunkulov, Tileubek Kitapbay, Aspen Abutalip and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Altyn KulpiisovaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, A. Baitursynov Kostanay Regional University, Kostanay, Kazakhstan.
Zukhra AitpayevaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Zhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian-Technical University, Uralsk, Kazakhstan.
Assiya MaimatayevaDepartment of Life Sciences, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Lyailya UssenovaDepartment of Zootechnology, Genetics andBreeding, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.
Assel ParitovaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Nur-Sultan/Astana, Kazakhstan.
Assylbek ZhanabayevDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Nur-Sultan/Astana, Kazakhstan.
Temirlan BakishevDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Nur-Sultan/Astana, Kazakhstan.
Spandiyar TursunkulovDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Nur-Sultan/Astana, Kazakhstan.
Tileubek KitapbayDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Nur-Sultan/Astana, Kazakhstan.
Aspen AbutalipDepartment of Bacteriology, Kazakh Scientific Veterinary Research Institute, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Assiya MussayevaDepartment of Bacteriology, Kazakh Scientific Veterinary Research Institute, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Yerzhan OspanovDepartment of Bacteriology, Kazakh Scientific Veterinary Research Institute, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Urzhan OmarbekovaDepartment of Bacteriology, Kazakh Scientific Veterinary Research Institute, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Bauyrzhan TuralinDepartment of Biology, K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan.
Vladislav SapaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, A. Baitursynov Kostanay Regional University, Kostanay, Kazakhstan.
Marat AisinDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, A. Baitursynov Kostanay Regional University, Kostanay, Kazakhstan.
Alim BizhanovDepartment of Bacteriology, Kazakh Scientific Veterinary Research Institute, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Gulnara BaikadamovaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Nur-Sultan/Astana, Kazakhstan.
Salbak Chylbak-OolDepartment of Protection in Emergency Situation, Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Elena PakhomovaDepartment of Protection in Emergency Situation, Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Nurkuisa RametovDepartment of Geospatial Engineering, Satbayev Kazakh National Research Technical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-8346-4147
Arman IssimovDepartment of Biology, K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-0486-0054
Nadezhda BurambayevaDepartment of Zootechnology, Genetics andBreeding, Toraighyrov University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnthrax is the most prioritized zoonotic disease in Kazakhstan due to its threatening potential to the public health and agricultural sector. Sporadic anthrax outbreaks are being reported annually among human and livestock populations throughout the country, with the highest frequency occurring in West Kazakhstan.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using a survey-based face-to-face interview. From January to May 2022, 489 randomly selected participants were surveyed in 6 districts of the Baiterek province in West Kazakhstan oblast to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) regarding anthrax among community members. This is the first KAP study conducted relating to outbreaks of anthrax in Kazakhstan.

resultsIn this study, most participants (74%) surveyed were males, and 40% of respondents had a secondary level education. Overall, 91% of the community respondents were engaged in agriculture and livestock rearing. Among these community members, cattle rearing was the most common (67%) occupation compared to other livestock species. Additionally, over a 50% of the population studied had no knowledge about the zoonotic nature of the disease, and about 82% and 87% of respondents were unaware of any animal and human anthrax symptoms, respectively. About 70% of the respondents were interested in vaccinating their livestock against anthrax. Individuals aged 45-54 displayed notably higher animal vaccination rates (45%; 95% CI: 38.4-52.0; p < 0.025) compared to those aged 25-34 and 65-74. Respondents residing in the Beles district (20%; 95% CI: 17.1-24.7; p < 0.005) exhibited a significantly higher level of awareness concerning the fatality of anthrax in contrast to participants from Bolashak. Roughly 61% of respondents held the belief that anthrax is a lethal disease. An overwhelming majority of the survey participants (99%) affirmed their non-participation in the slaughter of infected animals.

conclusionThe findings of this study indicate that KAP among community members relating to anthrax is low and requires swift implementation of education programmes in building awareness of anthrax under the One Health approach, especially in anthrax prone regions.

Indexed as

AnthraxFarmersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeLivestockAdolescentAdultAgedAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKazakhstanMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultanthraxattitude and practice (KAP)BayterekknowledgeWest Kazakhstanzoonosis

Identifiers

PMID39042567
PMCPMC11265527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.