ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2024
Constrained Independent Vector Analysis With Reference for Multi-Subject fMRI Analysis.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fusion of Multi-Task fMRI Data: Guided Solutions for IVA and Transposed IVA.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring synergies: Advancing neuroscience with machine learning.Signal processing · 2026Article
- Multidimensional Comparisons Between Constrained ICA/IVA Algorithms for Multi-Subject fMRI Data Analysis.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2026Article
- Mode Coresets for Efficient, Interpretable Tensor Decompositions: An Application to Feature Selection in fMRI Analysis.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIndependent component analysis (ICA) is now a widely used solution for the analysis of multi-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Independent vector analysis (IVA) generalizes ICA to multiple datasets (multi-subject data). Along with higher-order statistical information in ICA, it leverages the statistical dependence across the datasets as an additional type of statistical diversity. As such, IVA preserves variability in the estimation of single-subject maps but its performance might suffer when the number of datasets increases. Constrained IVA is an effective way to bypass computational issues and improve the quality of separation by incorporating available prior information. Existing constrained IVA approaches often rely on user-defined threshold values to define the constraints. However, an improperly selected threshold can have a negative impact on the final results. This paper proposes two novel methods for constrained IVA: one using an adaptive-reverse scheme to select variable thresholds for the constraints and a second one based on a threshold-free formulation by leveraging the unique structure of IVA. Notably, the proposed algorithms do not require all components to be constrained, utilizing free components to model interferences and components that might not be in the reference set. We demonstrate that our solutions provide an attractive solution to multi-subject fMRI analysis both by simulations and through analysis of resting state fMRI data collected from 98 subjects - the highest number of subjects ever used by IVA algorithms. Our results show that both proposed approaches obtain significantly better separation quality and model match while providing computationally efficient and highly reproducible solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.