SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2024
Plant-based therapies for urolithiasis: a systematic review of clinical and preclinical studies.
Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protective effects of Rhus coriaria L. fruit extract against experimental calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis via modulation of oxidative stress and renal injury.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
- Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Traditional Medicinal Plants for Urolithiasis: A Scoping Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Phytotherapy in Urolithiasis: An Updated Overview of Current Knowledge.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- In-vitro and in-vivo evaluation for anti-urolithiasis potential of Ficus racemosa L. bark extract in ethylene glycol induced rat model.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUrolithiasis, the formation of kidney stones, is a common and severe condition. Despite advances in understanding its pathophysiology, affordable treatment options are needed worldwide. Hence, the interest is in herbal medicines as alternative or supplementary therapy for urinary stone disease. This review explores the use of plant extracts and phytochemicals in preventing and treating urolithiasis.
methodsFollowing PRISMA standards, we systematically reviewed the literature on PubMed/Medline, focusing on herbal items evaluated in in vivo models, in vitro studies, and clinical trials related to nephrolithiasis/urolithiasis. We searched English language publications from January 2021 to December 2023. Studies assessing plant extracts and phytochemicals' therapeutic potential in urolithiasis were included. Data extracted included study design, stone type, plant type, part of plant used, solvent type, main findings, and study references.
resultsA total of 64 studies were included. Most studies used ethylene glycol to induce hyperoxaluria and nephrolithiasis in rat models. Various extraction methods were used to extract bioactive compounds from different plant parts. Several plants and phytochemicals, including Alhagi maurorum, Aerva lanata, Dolichos biflorus, Cucumis melo, and quercetin, demonstrated potential effectiveness in reducing stone formation, size, and number.
conclusionsNatural substances offer an alternative or supplementary approach to current treatments, potentially reducing pain and improving the quality of life for urolithiasis patients. However, further research is needed to clarify their mechanisms of action and optimize their therapeutic use. The potential of plant-based therapies in treating urolithiasis is promising, and ongoing research is expected to lead to treatment advancements benefiting patients globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39042342What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.