ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2025
Ultrasound-guided localization of the radial nerve along the humerus: providing reference points for safer upper arm surgery.
Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of transducer scanning velocity during extended field of view imaging acquisition on pennate and fusiform muscles echo intensity.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Article
- Ultrasound evaluation of radial nerve injuries by cortex overlapping screw tips after internal fixation of humeral fractures: a cadaveric study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe close proximity of the radial nerve to the humerus poses a risk during upper arm surgery. Although the general course of the radial nerve is well-known, its exact position in relation to anatomical reference points remains poorly investigated. This study aimed to develop a standardized protocol for the sonographic and clinical identification of the radial nerve in the upper arm. The ultimate goal is to assist surgeons in avoiding iatrogenic radial nerve palsy.
methodsA total of 76 measurements were performed in 38 volunteers (both sides). Ultrasound measurements were performed using a linear transducer (10 MHz) to identify the radial nerve at two key points: RD (where the radial nerve crosses the dorsal surface of the humerus) and RL (where the radial nerve crosses the lateral aspect of the humerus). Distances from specific reference points (acromion, lateral epicondyle, medial epicondyle, olecranon fossa) to RD and RL were measured, and the angle between the course of the nerve and the humeral axis was recorded. Humeral length was defined as the distance between the posterodorsal corner of the acromion and the lateral epicondyle.
resultsThe distance from the lateral epicondyle to RD was on average 15.5 cm ± 1.3, corresponding to 50% of the humeral length. The distance from the lateral epicondyle to RL was on average 6.7 cm ± 0.8, corresponding to 21% of the humeral length. The course of the nerve between RD and RL showed an average angulation of 37° to the anatomical axis of the humerus. Gender, BMI, dominant hand, and arm thickness did not correlate with the distances to RD or RL. Measurements were consistent between the left and right side.
conclusionThe radial nerve can typically be identified by employing a 1/2 and 1/5 ratio on the dorsal and lateral aspects of the humerus. Due to slight variations in individual anatomy, the utilization of ultrasound-assisted visualization presents a valuable and straightforward approach to mitigate the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy during upper arm surgery. This study introduces an easy and fast protocol for this purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.