Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39042303›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Validation of a commercially available CAD-system for lung nodule detection and characterization using CT-scans.

Jasika Paramasamy, Souvik Mandal, Maurits Blomjous, Ties Mulders, Daniel Bos, Joachim G J V Aerts, Prakash Vanapalli, Vikash Challa, Saigopal Sathyamurthy, Ranjana Devi and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jasika ParamasamyDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Souvik MandalQure.ai, Level 7, Oberoi Commerz II, Goregaon East, Mumbai, 400063, India.
Maurits BlomjousDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ties MuldersDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniel BosDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joachim G J V AertsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Prakash VanapalliQure.ai, Level 7, Oberoi Commerz II, Goregaon East, Mumbai, 400063, India.
Vikash ChallaQure.ai, Level 7, Oberoi Commerz II, Goregaon East, Mumbai, 400063, India.
Saigopal SathyamurthyQure.ai, Level 7, Oberoi Commerz II, Goregaon East, Mumbai, 400063, India.
Ranjana DeviQure.ai, Level 7, Oberoi Commerz II, Goregaon East, Mumbai, 400063, India.
Ritvik JainQure.ai, Level 7, Oberoi Commerz II, Goregaon East, Mumbai, 400063, India.
Jacob J VisserDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.j.visser@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9935-2097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to externally validate a commercially available Computer-Aided Detection (CAD)-system for the automatic detection and characterization of solid, part-solid, and ground-glass lung nodules (LN) on CT scans.

methodsThis retrospective study encompasses 263 chest CT scans performed between January 2020 and December 2021 at a Dutch university hospital. All scans were read by a radiologist (R1) and compared with the initial radiology report. Conflicting scans were assessed by an adjudicating radiologist (R2). All scans were also processed by CAD. The standalone performance of CAD in terms of sensitivity and false-positive (FP)-rate for detection was calculated together with the sensitivity for characterization, including texture, calcification, speculation, and location. The R1's detection sensitivity was also assessed.

resultsA total of 183 true nodules were identified in 121 nodule-containing scans (142 non-nodule-containing scans), of which R1 identified 165/183 (90.2%). CAD detected 149 nodules, of which 12 were not identified by R1, achieving a sensitivity of 149/183 (81.4%) with an FP-rate of 49/121 (0.405). CAD's detection sensitivity for solid, part-solid, and ground-glass LNs was 82/94 (87.2%), 42/47 (89.4%), and 25/42 (59.5%), respectively. The classification accuracy for solid, part-solid, and ground-glass LNs was 81/82 (98.8%), 16/42 (38.1%), and 18/25 (72.0%), respectively. Additionally, CAD demonstrated overall classification accuracies of 137/149 (91.9%), 123/149 (82.6%), and 141/149 (94.6%) for calcification, spiculation, and location, respectively.

conclusionsAlthough the overall detection rate of this system slightly lags behind that of a radiologist, CAD is capable of detecting different LNs and thereby has the potential to enhance a reader's detection rate. While promising characterization performances are obtained, the tool's performance in terms of texture classification remains a subject of concern. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Numerous lung nodule computer-aided detection-systems are commercially available, with some of them solely being externally validated based on their detection performance on solid nodules. We encourage researchers to assess performances by incorporating all relevant characteristics, including part-solid and ground-glass nodules. KEY POINTS: Few computer-aided detection (CAD) systems are externally validated for automatic detection and characterization of lung nodules. A detection sensitivity of 81.4% and an overall texture classification sensitivity of 77.2% were measured utilizing CAD. CAD has the potential to increase single reader detection rate, however, improvement in texture classification is required.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSolitary Pulmonary NoduleTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityComputer-assisted detectionEarly detection of cancerLungLung cancerValidation study

Identifiers

PMID39042303
PMCPMC11782423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.