Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39042285›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2024

Machine Learning Predicts Unplanned Care Escalations for Post-Anesthesia Care Unit Patients during the Perioperative Period: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Andrew B Barker, Ryan L Melvin, Ryan C Godwin, David Benz, Brant M Wagener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew B Barker *Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 901 19th Street South, PBMR 302, Birmingham, AL, 35294, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7889-1526
Ryan L Melvin *Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Ryan C GodwinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
David BenzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Brant M WagenerDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 901 19th Street South, PBMR 302, Birmingham, AL, 35294, United States of America. bwagener@uabmc.edu.

Funding

The Role of Sex Dimorphism in Post-TBI Bacterial PneumoniaR01GM127584 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WAGENER, BRANT M · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127584NIH HHS GM127584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite low mortality for elective procedures in the United States and developed countries, some patients have unexpected care escalations (UCE) following post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge. Studies indicate patient risk factors for UCE, but determining which factors are most important is unclear. Machine learning (ML) can predict clinical events. We hypothesized that ML could predict patient UCE after PACU discharge in surgical patients and identify specific risk factors.

methodsWe conducted a single center, retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (elective and emergent). We collected data from pre-operative visits, intra-operative records, PACU admissions, and the rate of UCE. We trained a ML model with this data and tested the model on an independent data set to determine its efficacy. Finally, we evaluated the individual patient and clinical factors most likely to predict UCE risk.

resultsOur study revealed that ML could predict UCE risk which was approximately 5% in both the training and testing groups. We were able to identify patient risk factors such as patient vital signs, emergent procedure, ASA Status, and non-surgical anesthesia time as significant variable. We plotted Shapley values for significant variables for each patient to help determine which of these variables had the greatest effect on UCE risk. Of note, the UCE risk factors identified frequently by ML were in alignment with anesthesiologist clinical practice and the current literature.

conclusionsWe used ML to analyze data from a single-center, retrospective cohort of non-cardiac surgical patients, some of whom had an UCE. ML assigned risk prediction for patients to have UCE and determined perioperative factors associated with increased risk. We advocate to use ML to augment anesthesiologist clinical decision-making, help decide proper disposition from the PACU, and ensure the safest possible care of our patients.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultAgedAnesthesia Recovery PeriodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerioperative PeriodPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsVital SignsArtificial IntelligencePatient SafetyPrecision MedicinePredictive AnalyticsRisk Stratification

Identifiers

PMID39042285
PMCPMC11266221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.