Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39042203›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2024

Organizational impact of systemic implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis as a primary test for breast cancer screening in Italy.

Olivera Djuric, Silvia Deandrea, Paola Mantellini, Francesco Sardanelli, Francesco Venturelli, Stefania Montemezzi, Riccardo Vecchio, Lauro Bucchi, Carlo Senore, Livia Giordano and 22 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Olivera DjuricAzienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Silvia DeandreaPavia Health Protection Agency, Pavia, Italy.
Paola MantelliniISPRO - Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica, Florence, Italy.
Francesco SardanelliIRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Francesco VenturelliAzienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Stefania MontemezziRadiology Unit, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Riccardo VecchioPavia Health Protection Agency, Pavia, Italy.
Lauro BucchiIRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori"-IRST S.r.l., Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy.
Carlo SenoreAOU Città della Salute e della Scienza-CPO Piemonte Turin, Turin, Italy.
Livia GiordanoAOU Città della Salute e della Scienza-CPO Piemonte Turin, Turin, Italy.
Eugenio PaciItalian Cancer League, LILT, Florence, Italy.
Adriana BonifacinoFondazione Incontra Donna, Rome, Italy.
Massimo CalabreseBreast Unit. IRCCS-Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Francesca CaumoIstituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Flori DegrassiAssociazione Nazionale Donne Operate al Seno-ANDOS, Milan, Italy.
Priscilla Sassoli De' BianchiDepartment of Health, Emilia-Romagna Region Administration, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca BattistiISPRO - Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica, Florence, Italy.
Marco ZappaISPRO - Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica, Florence, Italy.
Pierpaolo PattaciniAzienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Cinzia CampariAzienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Andrea NitrosiAzienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Giovanni Di LeoIRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Alfonso FrigerioAOU Città della Salute e della Scienza-CPO Piemonte Turin, Turin, Italy.
Veronica MagniIRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Francesca FornasaBreast Unit ULSS9 Scaligera, Ospedale Fracastoro, San Bonifacio, Verona, Italy.
Giovanna RomanucciBreast Unit ULSS9 Scaligera, Ospedale Fracastoro, San Bonifacio, Verona, Italy.
Patrizia FaliniISPRO - Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica, Florence, Italy.
Noemi AuzziISPRO - Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica, Florence, Italy.
Paola ArmaroliAOU Città della Salute e della Scienza-CPO Piemonte Turin, Turin, Italy.
Paolo Giorgi RossiAzienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy. paolo.giorgirossi@ausl.re.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9703-2460
MAITA working group
Italian Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines working group

Funding

Ministero della Salute RF-2016-02363686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe present a comprehensive investigation into the organizational, social, and ethical impact of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as a primary test for breast cancer screening in Italy. The analyses aimed to assess the feasibility of DBT specifically for all women aged 45-74, women aged 45-49 only, or those with dense breasts only.

methodsQuestions were framed according to the European Network of Health Technology Assessment (EuNetHTA) Screening Core Model to produce evidence for the resources, equity, acceptability, and feasibility domains of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) decision framework. The study integrated evidence from the literature, the MAITA DBT trials, and Italian pilot programs. Structured interviews, surveys, and systematic reviews were conducted to gather data on organizational impact, acceptability among women, reading and acquisition times, and the technical requirements of DBT in screening.

resultsImplementing DBT could significantly affect the screening program, primarily due to increased reading times and the need for additional human resources (radiologists and radiographers). Participation rates in DBT screening were similar, if not better, to those observed with standard digital mammography, indicating good acceptability among women. The study also highlighted the necessity for specific training for radiographers. The interviewed key persons unanimously considered feasible tailored screening strategies based on breast density or age, but they require effective communication with the target population.

conclusionsAn increase in radiologists' and radiographers' workload limits the feasibility of DBT screening. Tailored screening strategies may maximize the benefits of DBT while mitigating potential challenges.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMammographyAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMiddle AgedBreast neoplasmsDigital breast tomosynthesisDigital mammographyHealth technology assessmentMass screeningOrganizational impact

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.