Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39041916›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

CCPA: cloud-based, self-learning modules for consensus pathway analysis using GO, KEGG and Reactome.

Ha Nguyen, Van-Dung Pham, Hung Nguyen, Bang Tran, Juli Petereit, Tin Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CSIE: cancer subtyping via inference and ensemble.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Integrated data-driven biotechnology research environments.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ha NguyenDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Auburn University, AL 36849, USA.
Van-Dung PhamDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Auburn University, AL 36849, USA.
Hung NguyenDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Auburn University, AL 36849, USA.
Bang TranDepartment of Computer Science, California State University, Sacramento, CA 95819, USA.
Juli PetereitNevada Bioinformatics Center, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Tin NguyenDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Auburn University, AL 36849, USA.

Funding

Outreach/Diversity/Pipeline ProjectP20GM103440 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI Eduardo A Robleto · 2012 to 2026
$58.0M
A web-based platform for robust single-cell analysis, bulk data deconvolution and system-level analysisR44GM152152 · NIGMS · ADVAITA CORPORATION · PI IOSEF, CRISTIANA · 2023 to 2024
$1.8M
Personalization of graphical models using multi-omics data for subtype discovery and prognosisU01CA274573 · NCI · AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT AUBURN · PI LUU, HUNG N, NGUYEN, TIN C · 2023 to 2025
$1.4M
NASA 80NSSC22M0255National Science Foundation 2343019 and 2203236NCI NIH HHS 1U01CA274573-01A1NCI NIH HHS U01 CA274573NIGMS NIH HHS GM103440 and 1R44GM152152-01NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103440NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM152152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript describes the development of a resource module that is part of a learning platform named 'NIGMS Sandbox for Cloud-based Learning' (https://github.com/NIGMS/NIGMS-Sandbox). The module delivers learning materials on Cloud-based Consensus Pathway Analysis in an interactive format that uses appropriate cloud resources for data access and analyses. Pathway analysis is important because it allows us to gain insights into biological mechanisms underlying conditions. But the availability of many pathway analysis methods, the requirement of coding skills, and the focus of current tools on only a few species all make it very difficult for biomedical researchers to self-learn and perform pathway analysis efficiently. Furthermore, there is a lack of tools that allow researchers to compare analysis results obtained from different experiments and different analysis methods to find consensus results. To address these challenges, we have designed a cloud-based, self-learning module that provides consensus results among established, state-of-the-art pathway analysis techniques to provide students and researchers with necessary training and example materials. The training module consists of five Jupyter Notebooks that provide complete tutorials for the following tasks: (i) process expression data, (ii) perform differential analysis, visualize and compare the results obtained from four differential analysis methods (limma, t-test, edgeR, DESeq2), (iii) process three pathway databases (GO, KEGG and Reactome), (iv) perform pathway analysis using eight methods (ORA, CAMERA, KS test, Wilcoxon test, FGSEA, GSA, SAFE and PADOG) and (v) combine results of multiple analyses. We also provide examples, source code, explanations and instructional videos for trainees to complete each Jupyter Notebook. The module supports the analysis for many model (e.g. human, mouse, fruit fly, zebra fish) and non-model species. The module is publicly available at https://github.com/NIGMS/Consensus-Pathway-Analysis-in-the-Cloud. This manuscript describes the development of a resource module that is part of a learning platform named ``NIGMS Sandbox for Cloud-based Learning'' https://github.com/NIGMS/NIGMS-Sandbox. The overall genesis of the Sandbox is described in the editorial NIGMS Sandbox [1] at the beginning of this Supplement. This module delivers learning materials on the analysis of bulk and single-cell ATAC-seq data in an interactive format that uses appropriate cloud resources for data access and analyses.

Indexed as

Cloud ComputingSoftwareAnimalsComputational BiologyGene OntologyHumanscloud computingjupyter notebooksNIGMS sandboxpathway analysisself-learning module

Identifiers

PMID39041916
PMCPMC11264295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.