Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39041814›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology spectrum2024

Maximum likelihood estimators for colony-forming units.

K Michael Martini, Satya Spandana Boddu, Ilya Nemenman, Nic M Vega

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CcpA promotesmLife · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K Michael MartiniDepartment of Physics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5946-1122
Satya Spandana BodduDepartment of Physics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9727-2894
Ilya NemenmanDepartment of Physics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3024-4244
Nic M VegaDepartment of Physics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9929-6109

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2014173Simons Foundation (SF)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring the abundance of microbes in a sample is a common procedure with a long history, but best practices are not well-conserved across microbiological fields. Serial dilution methods are commonly used to dilute bacterial cultures to produce countable numbers of colonies, and from these counts, to infer bacterial concentrations measured in colony-forming units (CFUs). The most common methods to generate data for CFU point estimates involve plating bacteria on (or in) a solid growth medium and counting their resulting colonies or counting the number of tubes at a given dilution that have growth. Traditionally, these types of data have been analyzed separately using different analytic methods. Here, we build a direct correspondence between these approaches, which allows one to extend the use of the most probable number method from the liquid tubes experiments, for which it was developed, to the growth plates by viewing colony-sized patches of a plate as equivalent to individual tubes. We also discuss how to combine measurements taken at different dilutions, and we review several ways of analyzing colony counts, including the Poisson and truncated Poisson methods. We test all point estimate methods computationally using simulated data. For all methods, we discuss their relevant error bounds, assumptions, strengths, and weaknesses. We provide an online calculator for these estimators.Estimation of the number of microbes in a sample is an important problem with a long history. Yet common practices, such as combining results from different measurements, remain sub-optimal. We provide a comparison of methods for estimating abundance of microbes and detail a mapping between different methods, which allows to extend their range of applicability. This mapping enables higher precision estimates of colony-forming units (CFUs) using the same data already collected for traditional CFU estimation methods. Furthermore, we provide recommendations for how to combine measurements of colony counts taken across dilutions, correcting several misconceptions in the literature.

Indexed as

BacteriaColony Count, MicrobialLikelihood FunctionsPoisson Distributionbacterial countsCFUcolony count estimationdilution experimentsdilution platingmaximum likelihood estimatormost probable numberMPN

Identifiers

PMID39041814
PMCPMC11371269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.