ArticleBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2024
[Predictive value of preoperative pelvic floor electrophysiological parameters on early urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy].
Article in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of nomogram models for predicting urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the predictive value of preoperative pelvic floor electromyography (EMG) parameters for the risk of urinary incontinence after prostate cancer surgery.
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 271 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy in the urology department of Peking University First Hospital from January 2020 to October 2022. The data included patient age, body mass index (BMI), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, Gleason score, type of surgery, urethral reconstruction, lymph node dissection, nerve preservation, catheterization duration, D ' Amico risk classification, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson comorbidity index, postoperative duration, prostate volume, and pelvic floor EMG parameters (pre-resting mean, fast muscle mean, and slow muscle mean scores). Independent risk factors affecting early postoperative urinary incontinence were identified through multivariate Logistic regression analysis. The predictive efficacy of pelvic floor EMG results was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the optimal threshold for early postoperative urinary incontinence was determined based on the Youden index and clinical significance.
resultsThe study included 271 prostate cancer patients, with an 81.9% rate of voluntary urinary control post-surgery. The median score for fast pelvic floor muscles was 23.5(18.2, 31.6), and for slow muscles, it was 12.5(9.6, 17.3). Among the patients, 179 (66.1%) did not preserve nerves, and 110 (40.6%) underwent urethral reconstruction. Advanced age and low fast muscle scores were identified as independent risk factors for urinary incontinence. Patients aged ≤60 had 5.482 times the voluntary urinary control rate compared with those aged ≥70 (95%
conclusionPreoperative pelvic floor EMG parameters show good predictive accuracy and clinical applicability for the risk of urinary incontinence after prostate cancer surgery. These parameters can be used for early identification of urinary incontinence risk, with age and fast muscle scores being important predictors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39041551PMC11284456What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.