Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39041417›Full record

ArticleThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2024

Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing for survivors of life-threatening medical events.

Andrew Bates, David S Baldwin, Natalie Pattison, Helen Moyses, Nathan Tm Huneke, Samuele Cortese, Michael Pw Grocott, Rebecca Cusack

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew BatesClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
David S BaldwinClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Natalie PattisonSchool of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Helen MoysesClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Nathan Tm HunekeClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Samuele CorteseSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Michael Pw GrocottClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Rebecca CusackClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR), a psychological intervention programme, on symptoms related to traumatic stress in survivors of life-threatening medical events. SECONDARY

objectivesto evaluate whether the effects of EMDR differ according to the nature of the medical event (associated diagnosis or setting), measured outcome (post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, or quality of life), or intervention (online, face-to-face, group or individual sessions).

Indexed as

Eye Movement Desensitization ReprocessingStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSurvivorsAnxietyDepressionHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39041417
PMCPMC11264321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.