ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024
PhyloAln: A Convenient Reference-Based Tool to Align Sequences and High-Throughput Reads for Phylogeny and Evolution in the Omic Era.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current trend in phylogenetic and evolutionary analyses predominantly relies on omic data. However, prior to core analyses, traditional methods typically involve intricate and time-consuming procedures, including assembly from high-throughput reads, decontamination, gene prediction, homology search, orthology assignment, multiple sequence alignment, and matrix trimming. Such processes significantly impede the efficiency of research when dealing with extensive data sets. In this study, we develop PhyloAln, a convenient reference-based tool capable of directly aligning high-throughput reads or complete sequences with existing alignments as a reference for phylogenetic and evolutionary analyses. Through testing with simulated data sets of species spanning the tree of life, PhyloAln demonstrates consistently robust performance compared with other reference-based tools across different data types, sequencing technologies, coverages, and species, with percent completeness and identity at least 50 percentage points higher in the alignments. Additionally, we validate the efficacy of PhyloAln in removing a minimum of 90% foreign and 70% cross-contamination issues, which are prevalent in sequencing data but often overlooked by other tools. Moreover, we showcase the broad applicability of PhyloAln by generating alignments (completeness mostly larger than 80%, identity larger than 90%) and reconstructing robust phylogenies using real data sets of transcriptomes of ladybird beetles, plastid genes of peppers, or ultraconserved elements of turtles. With these advantages, PhyloAln is expected to facilitate phylogenetic and evolutionary analyses in the omic era. The tool is accessible at https://github.com/huangyh45/PhyloAln.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.