ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2024
Assessment of pulmonary function in COPD patients using dynamic digital radiography: A novel approach utilizing lung signal intensity changes during forced breathing.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent trends in scientific research in chest radiology: What to do or not to do? That is the critical question in research.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Regional lung function assessment using electrical impedance tomography in COPD, PRISm, and normal spirometry subjects: insights into early diagnostic potential.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the association of lung signal intensity changes during forced breathing using dynamic digital radiography (DDR) with pulmonary function and disease severity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: This retrospective study included 46 healthy subjects and 33 COPD patients who underwent posteroanterior chest DDR examination. We collected raw signal intensity and gray-scale image data. The lung contour was extracted on the gray-scale images using our previously developed automated lung field tracking system and calculated the average of signal intensity values within the extracted lung contour on gray-scale images. Lung signal intensity changes were quantified as SImax/SImin, representing the maximum ratio of the average signal intensity in the inspiratory phase to that in the expiratory phase. We investigated the correlation between SImax/SImin and pulmonary function parameters, and differences in SImax/SImin by disease severity. Results: SImax/SImin showed the highest correlation with VC (r Conclusion: This study suggests that the signal intensity changes of lung fields during forced breathing using DDR reflect the pathophysiology of COPD and can be a useful index in assessing pulmonary function in COPD patients, potentially improving COPD diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.