ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2024
CT-based radiomics combined with clinical features for invasiveness prediction and pathological subtypes classification of subsolid pulmonary nodules.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A radiomics-based machine learning model for the preoperative differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma subtypes.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a high-resolution computed tomography radiomics and three-dimensional deep learning diagnostic prediction model for preoperative differentiation of minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma in subsolid nodules.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Integrating deep learning and radiomics in the differentiation of major histological subtypes of invasive non-mucinous lung adenocarcinoma using positron emission tomography and computed tomography.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Predicting the invasiveness of ground-glass opacity predominant lung adenocarcinoma with clinical stage Ia: a CT-based semantic and radiomics analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To construct optimal models for predicting the invasiveness and pathological subtypes of subsolid nodules (SSNs) based on CT radiomics and clinical features. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective study involving two centers. A total of 316 patients with 353 SSNs confirmed as atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) were included from January 2019 to February 2023. Models based on CT radiomics and clinical features were constructed for classification of AAH/AIS and MIA, MIA and IAC, as well as lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma (LPA) and acinar-predominant adenocarcinoma (APA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the model performance. Finally, the nomograms based on the optimal models were established. Results: The nomogram based on the combined model (AAH/AIS versus MIA) consisting of lobulation, the GGN-vessel relationship, diameter, CT value, consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) and rad-score performed the best (AUC=0.841), while age, CT value, CTR and rad-score were the significant features for distinguishing MIA from IAC, the nomogram based on these features performed the best (AUC=0.878). There were no significant differences in clinical features between LPA and APA, while the radiomics model based on rad-score showed good performance for distinguishing LPA from APA (AUC=0.926). Conclusions: The nomograms based on radiomics and clinical features could predict the invasiveness of SSNs accurately. Moreover, radiomics models showed good performance in distinguishing LPA from APA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.