ArticleResearch square2024
On the detection of population heterogeneity in causation between two variables: Finite mixture modeling of data collected from twin pairs.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Causal inference is inherently complex, often dependent on key assumptions that are sometimes overlooked. One such assumption is the potential for unidirectional or bidirectional causality, while another is population homogeneity, which suggests that the causal direction between two variables remains consistent across the study sample. Discerning these processes requires meticulous data collection through an appropriate research design and the use of suitable software to define and fit alternative models. In psychiatry, the co-occurrence of different disorders is common and can stem from various origins. A patient diagnosed with two disorders might have one recognized as primary and the other as secondary, suggesting the existence of two types of comorbidity within the population. For example, in some individuals, depression might lead to substance use, while in others, substance use could lead to depression. Identifying the primary disorder is crucial for developing effective treatment plans. This article explores the use of finite mixture models to depict within-sample heterogeneity. We begin with the Direction of Causation (DoC) model for twin data and extend it to a mixture distribution model. This extension allows for the calculation of the likelihood of each individual's data for the two alternate causal directions. Given twin data, there are four possible pairwise combinations of causal direction. Through simulations, we investigate the Direction of Causation Twin Mixture (mixCLPM) model's potential to detect and model heterogeneity due to varying causal directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.