Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39041012›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Testing spatial transferability of species distribution models reveals differing habitat preferences for an endangered delphinid (

Steph Bennington, Peter W Dillingham, Scott D Bourke, Stephen M Dawson, Elisabeth Slooten, William J Rayment

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steph BenningtonDepartment of Marine Science University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6446-8724
Peter W DillinghamDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand.
Scott D BourkeDepartment of Ecology University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand.
Stephen M DawsonDepartment of Marine Science University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand.
Elisabeth SlootenDepartment of Zoology University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand.
William J RaymentDepartment of Marine Science University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs) can be used to predict distributions in novel times or space (termed transferability) and fill knowledge gaps for areas that are data poor. In conservation, this can be used to determine the extent of spatial protection required. To understand how well a model transfers spatially, it needs to be independently tested, using data from novel habitats. Here, we test the transferability of SDMs for Hector's dolphin (

Indexed as

cetaceanextrapolationHector's dolphinspatial transferabilityspecies distribution modelling

Identifiers

PMID39041012
PMCPMC11262828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.