Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39040978›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023

Siam-VAE: A hybrid deep learning based anomaly detection framework for automated quality control of head CT scans.

Soumyendu Sekhar Ghosh, Rajat Dhar, Daniel S Marcus, Aristeidis Sotiras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Soumyendu Sekhar GhoshDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Rajat DharDivision of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Daniel S MarcusDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Aristeidis SotirasDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

NINDS CENTER CORE FOR BRAIN IMAGINGP30NS098577 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS, DANIEL SCOTT · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
HIGH PERFORMANCE BIOMEDICAL IMAGING COMPUTER RESOURCESS10RR022984 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2009 to 2009
$1.9M
GENETICS AND PREDICTION OF CEREBRAL EDEMA AFTER HEMISPHERIC STROKEK23NS099440 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DHAR, RAJAT · 2017 to 2021
$890k
GPU COMPUTING RESOURCE TO ENABLE INNOVATION IN IMAGING AND NETWORK BIOLOGYS10OD018091 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PAPPU, ROHIT V, PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2014 to 2014
$598k
Acquisition of a next-generation computing clusterS10OD025200 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TOBIAS, MALCOLM · 2019 to 2019
$597k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR022984NIH HHS S10 OD018091NIH HHS S10 OD025200NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS099440NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS098577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An automated quality control (QC) system is essential to ensure streamlined head computed tomography (CT) scan interpretations that do not affect subsequent image analysis. Such a system is advantageous compared to current human QC protocols, which are subjective and time-consuming. In this work, we aim to develop a deep learning-based framework to classify a scan to be of usable or unusable quality. Supervised deep learning models have been highly effective in classification tasks, but they are highly complex and require large, annotated data for effective training. Additional challenges with QC datasets include - 1) class-imbalance - usable cases far exceed the unusable ones and 2) weak-labels - scan level labels may not match slice level labels. The proposed framework utilizes these weak labels to augment a standard anomaly detection technique. Specifically, we proposed a hybrid model that consists of a variational autoencoder (VAE) and a Siamese Neural Network (SNN). While the VAE is trained to learn how usable scans appear and reconstruct an input scan, the SNN compares how similar this input scan is to its reconstruction and flags the ones that are less similar than a threshold. The proposed method is more suited to capture the differences in non-linear feature structure between the two classes of data than typical anomaly detection methods that depend on intensity-based metrics like root mean square error (RMSE). Comparison with state-of-the-art anomaly detection methods using multiple classification metrics establishes superiority of the proposed framework in flagging inferior quality scans for review by radiologists, thus reducing their workload and establishing a reliable and consistent dataflow.

Indexed as

Anomaly DetectionCTQuality ControlSiamese Neural NetworkVariational Autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID39040978
PMCPMC11262463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.