ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Development of a nomogram for predicting malnutrition in elderly hospitalized cancer patients: a cross-sectional study in China.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for malnutrition in patients with cancer: a systematic review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Establishment and validation of a machine learning model to stratify malnutrition risk in hospitalized older patients with chronic heart failure.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- A nomogram for predicting the risk of malnutrition in hospitalized older adults: a retrospective study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of nomogram model for prognosis of gastritis patients based on baseline data and inflammatory and infectious markers.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) serves as a specialized nutritional assessment instrument designed for cancer patients. Despite its specificity, the complexity and time requirements of this tool, along with the necessity for administration by trained professionals, limit its practicality in clinical settings. Our objective is to identify a straightforward, efficient, and dependable nutritional assessment tool to promote broader adoption in clinical practice. Methods: This study encompassed a total of 450 patients diagnosed with cancer. Of these, 315 individuals constituted the training set, and the remaining 135 were allocated to the external validation set. The model variables were identified through the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression method. Binary logistic regression outcomes facilitated the development of a nomogram, offering a visual depiction of the predicted probabilities. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram model was evaluated by calculating the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The LASSO method detected four variables that were included in the final prediction model: age, serum albumin levels (ALB), body mass index (BMI), and activities of daily living (ADL). The area under the curve (AUC) for this prediction model was 0.905. Both the internal and external calibration curves for malnutrition showed that the predictive nomogram model was highly accurate. Conclusion: The study has developed a prediction model that demonstrates remarkable accuracy in forecasting malnutrition. Furthermore, it presents a streamlined nutritional assessment tool aimed at swiftly identifying cancer patients at nutritional risk, thereby facilitating oncologists in delivering targeted nutritional support to these individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.