ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2024
Considerations and Literature Review for Treating Subarachnoid Hemorrhage due to Blood Blister-Like Aneurysms.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) due to blood blister-like aneurysm (BBA) is rare but very risky during treatment. Moreover, there is no established treatment method. In this study, we performed endovascular treatment (EVT) as the first-line treatment on patients with SAH during the subacute phase, and cases were analyzed in this series. Methods: Patients with SAH due to BBA who visited our hospital between April 2021 and March 2023 were enrolled in this study. We waited as long as possible during the acute phase and performed EVT during the subacute phase. We performed stent-assisted coiling (SAC) as the first-line treatment and performed DSA approximately 6 months after treatment. Results: Ninety-six patients with SAH visited our hospital during the study period and six had SAH due to BBAs. There were two males and four females aged 56.2 ± 14.6 years. We performed SAC in five patients, and one died owing to rebleeding before treatment. Two patients received treatments because of rebleeding. One patient died on the day after rebleeding, whereas the other experienced rebleeding and treatments twice and achieved a good outcome. Four patients had good outcomes (modified Rankin scale [mRS]: 0). The surviving patients achieved complete occlusion at follow-up DSA. However, two patients had poor outcomes (mRS: 6). Conclusion: Patients with SAH due to BBA treated in the subacute phase may achieve good outcomes; however, there is a risk of rebleeding during the waiting period, which often causes poor outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.