ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Lessons learned from a multi-site collaborative working toward a digital health use screening tool.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying Skill and Usability Barriers to Digital Health Tool Use Among Older Adult Patients in US Safety Net Clinics: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Closing the digital divide for hemodialysis patients: implementing technology training and support in a digital patient activation intervention.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Bridging the Digital Divide with Digital Navigation in the California Safety Net: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Screening by Health Care Systems for Barriers to Patient Engagement With Digital Health Care: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Applying a process mapping methodology to identify barriers and facilitators to social needs screener and medical-legal partnership integration into primary care facilities.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- A self-report measure of digital skills needed to use digital health tools among older adults-the Skills Measurement and Readiness Training for Digital Health (SMART Digital Health) Scale.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Human-Centered Design to Tailor Telehealth Cardiac Rehabilitation to Diverse Populations: The MCNAIR Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- EHR-Based Social Needs Screening and Referral in Primary Care: Clinician and Staff Perspectives on Practices, Barriers, and Benefits.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital health has the potential to expand health care and improve outcomes for patients-particularly for those with challenges to accessing in-person care. The acceleration of digital health (and particularly telemedicine) prompted by the Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic facilitated continuity of care in some settings but left many health systems ill-prepared to address digital uptake among patients from underserved backgrounds, who already experience health disparities. As use of digital health grows and the digital divide threatens to widen, healthcare systems must develop approaches to evaluate patients' needs for digital health inclusion, and consequentially equip patients with the resources needed to access the benefits of digital health. However, this is particularly challenging given the absence of any standardized, validated multilingual screening instrument to assess patients' readiness for digital healthcare that is feasible to administer in already under-resourced health systems. This perspective is structured as follows: (1) the need for digital health exclusion risk screening, (2) our convening as a group of stakeholders, (3) our review of the known digital health screening tools and our assessment, (4) formative work with patients regarding their perceptions on language and concepts in the digital health screening tools, and (5) conclusion with recommendations for digital health advocates generated by this collaborative of digital health researchers and operations leaders. There is a need to develop a brief, effective tool to screen for digital health use that can be widely implemented in diverse populations. We include lessons learned from our experiences in developing and testing risk of digital health exclusion screening questions in our respective health systems (e.g., patient perception of questions and response options). Because we recognize that health systems across the country may be facing similar challenges and questions, this perspective aims to inform ongoing efforts in developing health system digital exclusion screening tools and advocate for their role in advancing digital health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.