ArticleHeliyon2024
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Techno-economic optimization of hybrid renewable systems for sustainable energy solutions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hybrid optimization method for optimal site selection and sizing of a hybrid photovoltaic water pumping/diesel/battery system.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-01-22Author Unresponsive · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
HRES (Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems) has been designed because of the increasing demand for environmentally friendly and sustainable energy. In this study, an Improved Subtraction-Average-Based Optimizer (ISABO) is presented for optimizing the HRES system by wind power, fuel cells, and solar energy. The suggested approach, by introducing adaptive mechanisms and enhancing processes, improves the performance of the traditional subtraction-average-based optimization. Optimization aims to provide reliable and efficient energy while lowering system expenses. The efficacy of ISABO is evaluated for this goal and compared with other optimization techniques. According to the findings, The ISABO algorithm, when equipped with adaptive mechanisms, surpasses conventional optimization techniques by achieving a 12 % decrease in Net Present Cost (NPC) and Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) along with a 45 % cost reduction in electrolyzers. Through simulations, it has been shown that the ISABO algorithm ensures the lowest average NPC at $1,357,018.15 while also upholding system reliability with just a 0.8 % decline in Load Point Supply Probability (LPSP) in the event of a PV unit failure. This research validates that hybrid PV/wind/fuel cell systems present superior cost-effectiveness and reliability, thereby opening doors for more economical renewable energy solutions. The study reveals hybrid PV/wind/fuel cell systems are more cost-effective than purely wind, PV, or fuel cell systems. This advancement in HRES design and optimization techniques will enable more cost-effective renewable energy options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.