ArticleJAAD international2024
Reliability of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index measurement tool for vitiligo.
Article in JAAD international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Objective Assessment of Target Vitiligo Areas by Semiautomatic Analysis of Standardized UV Images.JAMA dermatology · 2025Trial
- Scoring Systems in Vitiligo-A Narrative Review.Indian dermatology online journal · 2026Article
- Automated Measurement of Depigmentation Extent with a New AI Tool Applied to the Example of Vitiligo.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- A Quality Analysis of the Measurement Properties of the Clinician-Reported Outcome Measures for Vitiligo and of the Studies Assessing Them: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Assessment of auditory and cochlear function in non segmental vitiligo patients: a case controlled study.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Article
- Repigmentation in non-segmental vitiligo using the Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib, a retrospective case series.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A reliable instrument is needed to assess vitiligo severity and treatment response. Objective: To assess inter- and intrarater variability and accuracy of the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index among trained raters and to evaluate a proposed Vitiligo Area Scoring Index using equidistant 10% depigmentation increments (VASI 10%). Methods: In this prospective study, 12 raters evaluated images of 10 participants with vitiligo on 2 occasions using total body Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (T-VASI) and facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (F-VASI) scores after training. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities and accuracy vs digital scores were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients. VASI 10% scores were evaluated separately for interrater reliability and accuracy. Results: F-VASI interrater reliability improved from "moderate" to "good" between time points, while T-VASI was "good" at both time points. Intrarater reliability ranged from "good" to "excellent" for T-VASI and "poor" to "excellent" for F-VASI. Accuracy intraclass correlation coefficient was "good" to "excellent" for most raters. Interrater reliability using VASI 10% was "moderate" for both T-VASI and F-VASI. Limitations: Small participant population and number of raters; participants were not assessed in person; no repeated VASI 10% measures. Conclusion: Vitiligo Area Scoring Index generally provides good to excellent reliability for assessment of vitiligo by raters who receive standardized training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.