Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39040822›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest in Large Animals (HACA-LA): Study protocol of a randomized controlled experimental trial.

Olof Persson, Anna Valerianova, Jan Bělohlávek, Tobias Cronberg, Niklas Nielsen, Elisabet Englund, Mikuláš Mlček, Hans Friberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olof PerssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anna ValerianovaThird Department of Internal Medicine, General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan BělohlávekSecond Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tobias CronbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Neurology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Niklas NielsenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Elisabet EnglundDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Mikuláš MlčekInstitute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Hans FribergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Induced hypothermia post-cardiac arrest is neuroprotective in animal experiments, but few high-quality studies have been performed in larger animals with human-like brains. The neuroprotective effect of postischemic hypothermia has recently been questioned in human trials. Our aim is to investigate whether hypothermia post-cardiac arrest confers a benefit compared to normothermia in large adult animals. Our hypothesis is that induced hypothermia post cardiac arrest is neuroprotective and that the effect diminishes when delayed two hours Methods: Adult female pigs were anesthetized, mechanically ventilated and kept at baseline parameters including normothermia (38 °C). All animals were subjected to ten minutes of cardiac arrest (no-flow) by induced ventricular fibrillation, followed by four minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with mechanical compressions, prior to the first countershock. Animals with sustained return of spontaneous circulation (systolic blood pressure >60 mmHg for ten minutes) within fifteen minutes from start of life support were included and randomized to three groups; immediate or delayed (2 h) intravenous cooling, both targeting 33 °C, or intravenously controlled normothermia (38 °C). Temperature control was applied for thirty hours including cooling time, temperature at target and controlled rewarming (0.5 °C/h). Animals were extubated and kept alive for seven days. The primary outcome measure is histological brain injury on day seven. Secondary outcomes include neurological and neurocognitive recovery, and the trajectory of biomarkers of brain injury. Conclusion: High-quality animal experiments in clinically relevant large animal models are necessary to close the gap of knowledge regarding neuroprotective effects of induced hypothermia after cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestFunctional outcomeHypothermiaSwineTemperature control

Identifiers

PMID39040822
PMCPMC11261465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.