ArticleCureus2024
Screening a Suspected Malingerer Using the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised and Visual Analogue Pain Scale Questionnaires.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning curve analysis of transvaginal pelvic reconstruction surgery with four-wing mesh.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malingering in healthcare leads to a significant financial burden, so identifying patients who may be more likely to malinger is a critical step in minimizing the ever-growing cost of healthcare in the United States. Malingering is a clinical diagnosis with no well-established diagnostic tests. General guiding principles exist to determine whether or not a patient is malingering, but there is no well-established set of guidelines that can be used in common to identify malingering. Our team cared for a 51-year-old black, female patient who presented to an outpatient clinic due to generalized pain following a motor vehicle accident (MVA). The patient's symptomatology, clinical progression, and imaging results were discordant with one another, which prompted clinical suspicion of malingering. After careful deliberation, the care team suspected that the patient was malingering. Therefore, the clinical management was limited to a conservative pain management regimen and minimal clinical follow-up to avoid unnecessary healthcare expenditures. This article aims to discuss general principles and specific strategies for how a clinician can approach a case of suspected malingering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.