ArticleCureus2024
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Detection of Anaemia Using the Clinical Appearance of the Gingiva.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anaemia: A Scientific Overview on Types and Recent Advancements in the Detection of Anaemia.Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in diagnosing and managing temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
- Exploring AI as a Diagnostic Tool in Medical Imaging for Dermatopathological Diseases.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim Millions suffer from anaemia worldwide, and systemic disorders like anaemia harm oral health. Anaemia is linked to periodontitis as certain inflammatory cytokines produced during periodontal inflammation can depress erythropoietin production leading to the development of anemia. Thus, detecting and treating it is crucial to tooth health. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate three different machine-learning approaches for the automated detection of anaemia using clinical intraoral pictures of a patient's gingiva. Methodology Orange was employed with squeeze net embedding models for machine learning. Using 300 intraoral clinical photographs of patients' gingiva, logistic regression, neural network, and naive Bayes were trained and tested for prediction and detection. Accuracy was measured using a confusion matrix and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results In the present study, three convolutional neural network (CNN)-embedded machine-learning algorithms detected and predicted anaemia. For anaemia identification, naive Bayes had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.77, random forest plot had an AUV of 0.78, and logistic regression had 0.85. Thus, the three machine learning methods detected anaemia with 77%, 78%, and 85% accuracy, respectively. Conclusion Using artificial intelligence (AI) with clinical intraoral gingiva images can accurately predict and detect anaemia. These findings need to be confirmed with larger samples and additional imaging modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.