ArticleCureus2024
Comparing Left Ventricular Structure and Functions in End-Stage Renal Disease Using Conventional Echocardiography and 2D Speckle Tracking Echocardiography.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hemodynamic effects of hemodialysis: the interaction between the heart and the arteries.Journal of nephrology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients on hemodialysis (HD) are prone to various cardiovascular complications. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D STE) is an innovative technique for early myocardial dysfunction detection, even with normal ejection fraction (EF).
objectiveWe aim to detect left ventricle (LV) dysfunction in regular hemodialysis patients using 2D STE compared to traditional echocardiography.
methodsThe study comprised 30 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), subdivided according to left ventricular mass index (LVMI) into group 1 with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (n=19) and group 2 without LVH (n=11). Another 30 healthy control subjects were recruited as group 3. The EF, average systolic velocity (Sa), and 2D LV strain were taken as measures of LV systolic function. The indicators for diastolic function included the E/A ratio and E velocity/peak early diastolic velocity.
resultsRegarding the parameters of LV systolic and diastolic functions assessed by traditional echocardiography, we found no significant difference between groups 1 and 2. However, using 2D STE, we observed significant differences in the average Sa velocity (p=0.025), average LV strain (p=0.03), 2D global longitudinal strain (GLS) (p=0.03), E/Ea (p=0.003), and LV myocardial performance index (MPI) (p=0.006). Also, a significant positive correlation was found between LVMI and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (p<0.01, r=0.63), EF measured by 2D (p=0.034, r=0.39), mitral E/A ratio (p=0.03, r=0.49), and mitral E/Ea (p<0.01, r=0.72). There was a significantly strong negative correlation between LVMI and 2D average LV strain (p=0.034, r=-0.39).
conclusionWe concluded that 2D STE is more sensitive than a conventional echo in detecting early LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction even in patients with normal EF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.