ArticleArXiv2024
Pseudo-perplexity in One Fell Swoop for Protein Fitness Estimation.
Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein language models trained on the masked language modeling objective learn to predict the identity of hidden amino acid residues within a sequence using the remaining observable sequence as context. They do so by embedding the residues into a high dimensional space that encapsulates the relevant contextual cues. These embedding vectors serve as an informative context-sensitive representation that not only aids with the defined training objective, but can also be used for other tasks by downstream models. We propose a scheme to use the embeddings of an unmasked sequence to estimate the corresponding masked probability vectors for all the positions in a single forward pass through the language model. This One Fell Swoop (OFS) approach allows us to efficiently estimate the pseudo-perplexity of the sequence, a measure of the model's uncertainty in its predictions, that can also serve as a fitness estimate. We find that ESM2 OFS pseudo-perplexity performs nearly as well as the true pseudo-perplexity at fitness estimation, and more notably it defines a new state of the art on the ProteinGym Indels benchmark. The strong performance of the fitness measure prompted us to investigate if it could be used to detect the elevated stability reported in reconstructed ancestral sequences. We find that this measure ranks ancestral reconstructions as more fit than extant sequences. Finally, we show that the computational efficiency of the technique allows for the use of Monte Carlo methods that can rapidly explore functional sequence space.
Identifiers
39040648PMC11261985What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.