ArticleHuman reproduction open2024
The risk of asthma in singletons conceived by ART: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic, environmental, and sex-specific programming of long-term health in Assisted Reproductive Technologies-conceived offspring†.Biology of reproduction · 2026Review
- Altered expression of Toll-like receptor 9 in the lung tissue of adult mice generated by in vitro embryo culture and embryo transfer.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Article
- Atopic Disease Development in Offspring Conceived via Assisted Reproductive Technology.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The Clinical Registry of Childhood Asthma (CRCA) Elucidating Early-Life Asthma: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Prospective, Longitudinal, and Digitally Enhanced Real-World Cohort.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionDo singleton children conceived by ART have a higher asthma risk than naturally conceived (NC) singletons? SUMMARY ANSWER: The asthma risk was similar for ART-conceived singletons and NC singletons, and there were no clear differences between the various types of ART. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Whether ART increases asthma risk in offspring is questionable. The evidence is inconsistent and limited by ethnicity, geographic distribution, inadequate confounder adjustment, unsatisfactory control groups, and specific methods of ART. Furthermore, the mediating effects of obstetric and neonatal outcomes on the association between ART and asthma remain unclear. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This observational, single-centre study was conducted at a reproductive centre of an affiliated university hospital between September 2009 and April 2023. A total of 3227 singletons aged 3-6 years conceived by IVF versus ICSI or fresh versus frozen embryo transfer were retrospectively enrolled, and a total of 1206 NC singletons of the same age were subsequently recruited. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsAsthma was defined as a self-reported physician diagnosis or wheezing in the past 12 months. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine associations between asthma in offspring and ART use, adjusting for parental characteristics (age, education level, occupation type, BMI, asthma), smoking exposure, residence type, child sex, child age, and year of follow-up. Mediating effects were explored using longitudinal mediation structural equation modelling. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Asthma was reported for 51 (4.2%) of the 1206 NC singletons (median [interquartile range] age 5 [4-5] years; 48.1% females) and 169 (5.2%) of the 3227 ART-conceived singletons (5 [5-5] years; 47.6% females). We found that risks of childhood asthma in singletons conceived by ART were, overall, similar to those of NC singletons before (odds ratio [OR], 1.25 [95% CI, 0.92-1.74]; LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is limited to singletons only and cannot be generalized. The study is also limited by its retrospective observational single-centre nature and sample size. Mediation analyses were exploratory. Therefore, the findings need to be interpreted with caution. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThese findings can help infertile couples undergoing ART be reassured about the risk of childhood asthma in singleton offspring. Breastfeeding is recommended as a potentially feasible intervention to reduce the asthma risks in ART-conceived children who are at increased potential risk of asthma, such as those with NICU admissions. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (2021C03100), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2700603), and the Program for Key Subjects of Zhejiang Province in Medicine and Hygiene to Y. Z., the Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation (No. LQ22H040006) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82101759) to M.T., and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82201860) to J.Y. The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300069906.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.