Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39040620›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2024

Survival Patterns Based on First-site-specific Visceral Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Are Outcomes of Visceral Metastases the Same?

Mohamed E Ahmed, Ahmed M Mahmoud, Guiseppe Reitano, Wael Zeina, Kelly Lehner, Carter A Day, Irbaz Riaz, Daniel S Childs, Jacob J Orme, A Tuba Kendi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mohamed E AhmedDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ahmed M MahmoudDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Guiseppe ReitanoDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Wael ZeinaDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kelly LehnerDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Carter A DayDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Irbaz RiazDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Daniel S ChildsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jacob J OrmeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
A Tuba KendiDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Geoffrey B JohnsonDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
R Jeffrey KarnesDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Eugene D KwonDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jack R AndrewsDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Visceral metastatic disease in prostate cancer patients conveys a poor prognosis. Using advanced imaging techniques, studies have demonstrated increasing detection rates of visceral metastasis. Visceral metastases are now seen in up to 30-60% of prostate cancer patients. Survival patterns of site-specific visceral metastasis are described poorly in the literature. Here, we sought to investigate survival patterns in prostate cancer patients according to their first detected site of visceral metastasis. Methods: Retrospectively, we identified 203 prostate cancer patients with visceral metastases from the Mayo Clinic Advanced Prostate Cancer Registry. Patients were divided into three groups according to the first site of visceral metastases detected: lung, brain, or liver. Visceral metastases were detected primarily on either metabolic imaging (C-11 choline) or prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography (CT) scan. Confirmation of visceral metastasis diagnosis was established with either biopsy when feasible or focused conventional imaging, including focused CT or magnetic resonance imaging. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression model was conducted to assess different variables that affect overall and cancer-specific survival. Key findings and limitations: Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up duration of 16.2 (3.9-49.8) mo, the overall and cancer-specific survival of the entire cohort suggests better survival patterns in patients with first-site lung metastases than in patients with first-site brain or liver metastases ( Conclusions and clinical implications: These data suggest that prostate cancer patients with visceral metastatic disease have varying survival patterns according to first-site detected visceral metastasis. In our cohort, patients with first-site lung metastasis demonstrated better survival outcomes than patients with first-site brain or liver metastasis. Patient summary: Our study explored the survival outcomes among patients with visceral metastatic prostate cancer employing cutting-edge imaging methods. Prostate cancer patients with metastases to different organs have different survival rates. Patients with cancer spreading to the lungs first showed better survival than those with cancer spreading to the brain or liver first.

Indexed as

Metastatic diseaseOverall survivalProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID39040620
PMCPMC11260861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.