ArticleERJ open research2024
Circulating biomarkers and progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: data from the INMARK trial.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhaled LTI-03 for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomized dose escalation study.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and interleukins: a bibliometric analysis [1999-2025].Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Circulating biomarkers in subjects with progressive pulmonary fibrosis: data from the INBUILD trial.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Serum Biomarkers of Pulmonary Damage and Risk for Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.The Journal of rheumatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Effects of nintedanib on circulating biomarkers of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Clustering-aided prediction of outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Respiratory research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We used data from the INMARK trial to investigate associations between circulating biomarkers of extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover, inflammation and epithelial dysfunction and disease progression in subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Methods: Subjects with IPF and forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥80% predicted were randomised 1:2 to receive nintedanib 150 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks followed by open-label nintedanib for 40 weeks. Associations between baseline biomarker levels and the proportion of subjects with disease progression (decline in FVC ≥10% predicted or death) over 52 weeks were assessed in subjects randomised to placebo using logistic regression. Associations between baseline demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker levels and disease progression over 52 weeks were analysed using multivariate models. Results: Of 230 subjects who received placebo for 12 weeks then open-label nintedanib for 40 weeks, 70 (30.4%) had disease progression over 52 weeks. Baseline levels of CRPM (C-reactive protein (CRP) degraded by matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1/8), C3M (collagen 3 degraded by MMP-9), CRP, KL-6 (Krebs von den Lungen-6) and SP-D (surfactant protein D) were not significantly associated with disease progression over 52 weeks in analyses corrected for multiple comparisons. In models including only baseline demographic/clinical characteristics, 61.2-64.2% of subjects were correctly classified as having or not having disease progression over 52 weeks. When both demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker levels were included in the models, 50.0-64.5% of the test set were correctly classified. Conclusions: Among subjects with IPF and preserved FVC, multivariate models based on demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker levels at baseline did not provide an accurate prediction of which patients would progress.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.