Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39040590›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2024

Circulating biomarkers and progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: data from the INMARK trial.

Toby M Maher, R Gisli Jenkins, Vincent Cottin, Yasuhiko Nishioka, Imre Noth, Moisés Selman, Jin Woo Song, Carina Ittrich, Claudia Diefenbach, Susanne Stowasser and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Toby M MaherNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
R Gisli JenkinsNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Vincent CottinNational Reference Coordinating Centre for Rare Pulmonary Diseases, Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, UMR754, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5591-0955
Yasuhiko NishiokaGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6311-1654
Imre NothDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Moisés SelmanInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias "Ismael Cosio Villegas", Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-4783
Jin Woo SongDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Carina IttrichBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Claudia DiefenbachBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Susanne StowasserBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Eric S WhiteBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We used data from the INMARK trial to investigate associations between circulating biomarkers of extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover, inflammation and epithelial dysfunction and disease progression in subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Methods: Subjects with IPF and forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥80% predicted were randomised 1:2 to receive nintedanib 150 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks followed by open-label nintedanib for 40 weeks. Associations between baseline biomarker levels and the proportion of subjects with disease progression (decline in FVC ≥10% predicted or death) over 52 weeks were assessed in subjects randomised to placebo using logistic regression. Associations between baseline demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker levels and disease progression over 52 weeks were analysed using multivariate models. Results: Of 230 subjects who received placebo for 12 weeks then open-label nintedanib for 40 weeks, 70 (30.4%) had disease progression over 52 weeks. Baseline levels of CRPM (C-reactive protein (CRP) degraded by matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1/8), C3M (collagen 3 degraded by MMP-9), CRP, KL-6 (Krebs von den Lungen-6) and SP-D (surfactant protein D) were not significantly associated with disease progression over 52 weeks in analyses corrected for multiple comparisons. In models including only baseline demographic/clinical characteristics, 61.2-64.2% of subjects were correctly classified as having or not having disease progression over 52 weeks. When both demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker levels were included in the models, 50.0-64.5% of the test set were correctly classified. Conclusions: Among subjects with IPF and preserved FVC, multivariate models based on demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker levels at baseline did not provide an accurate prediction of which patients would progress.

Identifiers

PMID39040590
PMCPMC11261372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.