ArticleERJ open research2024
Lung cancer among outpatients with COPD: a 7-year cohort study.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung cancer incidence and risk factors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Malignancy risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis initiating biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a 5-year population-based cohort study.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Article
- The Role of Computed Tomography and Artificial Intelligence in Evaluating the Comorbidities of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A One-Stop CT Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lung cancer (LC) is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and its prognosis upon metastasis remains poor. Patients with COPD face a significantly elevated LC risk, up to six times greater than those with normal lung function. We aimed to investigate LC prevalence and stage distribution among COPD outpatients. Furthermore, we aimed to outline the COPD-related variables associated with referral for LC examination. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis encompassing the period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2018 on all outpatients with COPD and LC and individuals referred for LC examinations. Results: Among all COPD outpatients, 2231 patients (18%) were referred for LC examinations and 565 (4.6%) were diagnosed with LC. LC patients with COPD were more likely to be stage I-II, in contrast to the non-COPD LC population (46% Conclusion: Our study revealed a notably high LC incidence among COPD outpatients. LC patients with COPD were diagnosed at earlier stages, and outpatients with more pronounced COPD symptoms were more inclined to undergo LC diagnostics. The overrepresentation of LC cases among COPD outpatients emphasises the importance of tailoring specific screening initiatives for this demographic.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.