ArticlePolish journal of radiology2024
Morphological evaluation of maxillary arch in unilateral buccally and palatally impacted canines: a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based study in Northern Iran.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the impact of unilateral palatally impacted maxillary canine on maxillary sinus volume: a split-mouth study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Relationship between root formation progress of adjacent teeth and external root resorption associated with impacted maxillary canines: a retrospective cross-sectional CBCT study.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- Maxillary Arch Morphology in Unilateral Buccally and Palatally Impacted Maxillary Canines: A Three-Dimensional Digital Model Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Buccal Bone Thickness of Maxillary Incisors Adjacent to Palatally Impacted Canines: A Split-Mouth CBCT Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of nasal passage and palatal morphology in patients with impacted maxillary canine: a retrospective study using cone-beam computed tomography.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the association between the maxillary impacted canines' position and the maxilla's morphological features in an Iranian population based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Material and methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study, 47 CBCT images of unilateral buccally impacted maxillary canines and 47 CBCT images of unilateral palatally impacted maxillary canines were examined. Several morphological variables were compared between the impacted and non-impacted sides, and between the buccal and palatal impaction types. Results: Gender and age were not significantly associated with the canine impaction type. The alveolar bone height at the impacted side was significantly greater in the buccally impacted group than in the palatally impacted group ( Conclusion: Among the studied variables, the alveolar bone thickness showed contrary results at different depths. The palatal volume and maxillary arch width were significantly smaller on the impacted side in both buccal and palatal groups, and the arch perimeter showed the same results only in the buccal group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.