Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39040559›Full record

ReviewPolish journal of radiology2024

The diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in detecting temporomandibular joint bony disorders: a systematic review.

Marta Szcześniak, Julien Issa, Irem Öztürk, Emre Karahan, Agata Czajka-Jakubowska, Kaan Orhan, Marta Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marta SzcześniakDepartment of Diagnostics, Chair of Practical Clinical Dentistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Julien IssaDepartment of Diagnostics, Chair of Practical Clinical Dentistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Irem ÖztürkDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Emniyet, Ankara, Turkey.
Emre KarahanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Emniyet, Ankara, Turkey.
Agata Czajka-JakubowskaDepartment of Orthodontics and Temporomandibular Disorders, Chair of Practical Clinical Dentistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Kaan OrhanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Emniyet, Ankara, Turkey.
Marta Dyszkiewicz-KonwińskaDepartment of Diagnostics, Chair of Practical Clinical Dentistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) has been recognized as a robust and dependable technique for delineating osseous alterations and anomalies within hard tissues. The necessity for accurate diagnosis and management of patients with temporomandibular disorders in dental practices has increasingly come to the forefront. There is ongoing scholarly debate regarding the equivalence of diagnostic outcomes yielded by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), which offers greater accessibility in dental settings than traditional CT, in identifying bony changes within the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Our principal aim was to conduct a systematic review of studies that compare the efficacy of CT and CBCT in the detailed assessment of bone conditions affecting the TMJ. An electronic search was conducted across databases: PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane and Scopus. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts against predefined inclusion criteria. The included articles underwent rigorous critical appraisal, during which relevant data were extracted and systematically presented in a tabular format. This systematic review incorporates 5 studies published between 2006 and 2015. In 3 studies, CBCT demonstrated comparable outcomes to CT, while 2 investigations revealed significantly enhanced accuracy for CBCT compared to CT, with reported accuracies of 0.95 ± 0.04, 0.77 ± 0.17, and 89-91% for CBCT. The aggregated evidence from the included studies indicates that CBCT offers comparable or superior accuracy in detecting osseous changes within TMJ structures. Owing to its lower radiation exposure and increased accessibility, CBCT emerges as the preferred choice over conventional CT for evaluating bony structures of the TMJ.

Indexed as

cone beam computed tomographydental imagingtemporomandibular disorderstemporomandibular jointtemporomandibular joint imaging

Identifiers

PMID39040559
PMCPMC11262012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.