Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39040528›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Impact of pembrolizumab treatment duration on overall survival and prognostic factors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Adrien Rousseau, Stefan Michiels, Noémie Simon-Tillaux, Alexandre Lolivier, Julia Bonastre, David Planchard, Fabrice Barlesi, Jordi Remon, Pernelle Lavaud, Mihaela Aldea and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Risk factors associated with cardiovascular hospital admissions and all-cause mortality in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Adrien RousseauDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Thoracic Group and International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Stefan MichielsOncostat U1018, Inserm, Labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Noémie Simon-TillauxOncostat U1018, Inserm, Labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Alexandre LolivierOncostat U1018, Inserm, Labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Julia BonastreOncostat U1018, Inserm, Labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
David PlanchardDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Thoracic Group and International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Fabrice BarlesiDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Thoracic Group and International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Jordi RemonDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Thoracic Group and International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Pernelle LavaudDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Thoracic Group and International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Mihaela AldeaDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Thoracic Group and International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Maxime FrelautDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Thoracic Group and International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Cecile Le PechouxDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Angela BotticellaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Antonin LevyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Anas GazzahDepartment of Drug Development, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Stephanie FoulonOncostat U1018, Inserm, Labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
Benjamin BesseDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Thoracic Group and International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of front-line pembrolizumab has been established in studies that limit treatment duration to 2 years, but decision to stop pembrolizumab after 2 years is often at physician's discretion. ATHENA is a retrospective cohort study using a comprehensive administrative database aimed firstly at exploring the optimal duration of pembrolizumab and secondly real-life prognosis factors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Using the French National Health Insurance database (SNDS), we identified patients with incident lung cancer in France from 2015 to 2022. Treatments and patients' characteristics were extracted or inferred from hospital, outpatient care, pharmacy delivery reports. The duration's hazard ratio (HR) was estimated with Cox model weighted by inverse of propensity score to account for confounding. Prognostics factors in first line population were identified with Cox model selected by a LASSO procedure. Findings: 391,106 patients with lung cancer were identified, of whom 43,359 received up-front pembrolizumab for an advanced disease. There were 67% (29,040/43,359) of male and the median age at diagnosis was 65 years old. After a median follow-up time of 25.9 months (min-max, [0-97.6]), the median overall survival (OS) after pembrolizumab initiation in first line was 15.7 [CI 95, 15.3-16.0] months. In multivariable analysis, several covariables were independently associated with worse OS, including male sex with chemo-immunotherapy, age, hospital category, high deprivation index, inpatient hospitalization for first pembrolizumab, and history of diabetes, diuretic, beta blocker, painkiller prescription. At landmark time of 29 months after pembrolizumab initiation, continuation beyond 2 years was not associated with better OS than a fixed 2-year treatment, HR = 0.97 [0.75-1.26] p = 0.95. Interpretation: This study supports the notion that stopping pembrolizumab after 2 years could be safe for patients with advanced NSCLC. However, because observational studies are prone to confounding and selection bias, causality cannot be affirmed. Funding: This study did not receive any specific grant.

Indexed as

CohortIPTWNSCLCPembrolizumabReal-life data

Identifiers

PMID39040528
PMCPMC11262181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.