Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39040523›Full record

ReviewDEN open2025

Current status of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Eizaburo Ohno, Teiji Kuzuya, Naoto Kawabe, Kazunori Nakaoka, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Takuji Nakano, Kohei Funasaka, Ryoji Miyahara, Senju Hashimoto, Yoshiki Hirooka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Diagnostic and Predictive Features of Pancreatic Cysts Using Endoscopic Ultrasound: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Centre.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eizaburo OhnoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Fujita Health University School of Medicine Aichi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7730-4630
Teiji KuzuyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Fujita Health University School of Medicine Aichi Japan.
Naoto KawabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Fujita Health University School of Medicine Aichi Japan.
Kazunori NakaokaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Fujita Health University School of Medicine Aichi Japan.
Hiroyuki TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Fujita Health University School of Medicine Aichi Japan.
Takuji NakanoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Fujita Health University School of Medicine Aichi Japan.
Kohei FunasakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Fujita Health University School of Medicine Aichi Japan.
Ryoji MiyaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Fujita Health University School of Medicine Aichi Japan.
Senju HashimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital Aichi Japan.
Yoshiki HirookaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Fujita Health University School of Medicine Aichi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9639-7425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new Kyoto guidelines for the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of IPMN. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a diagnostic modality with a high spatial resolution that allows detailed observation and obtaining cyst fluid or tissue samples via EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Currently, EUS is an indispensable examination method for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. On the other hand, there have been concerns that EUS imaging tends to be highly operator-dependent, and may lack objectivity. Previous guidelines have assigned EUS as an option for patients with worrisome features. However, recent reports indicate that the sensitivity of EUS for the diagnosis of mural nodules (MNs) is more than 90%, comparable or superior to that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. The specific advantages of EUS in the diagnosis of IPMN are: (1) high spatial resolution imaging for the diagnosis of MNs, (2) contrast-enhanced EUS for differentiation of intra-cystic MNs from mucous clots, and (3) pathological diagnosis using EUS-FNA and differential diagnosis of a pancreatic cystic tumor by cystic fluid analysis. In order to utilize EUS in the diagnosis of IPMN, endoscopists are required to have the skills to provide sufficiently objective imaging findings.

Indexed as

contrast‐enhanced harmonic EUSEUSEUS‐guided fine needle aspirationintraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmsmural nodule

Identifiers

PMID39040523
PMCPMC11260769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.