ArticleHealth law in Canada2019
Plutonormativity: Illuminating Inequities in Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.
Article in Health law in Canada, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Researchers and research subjects are reporting that the results of genetic testing, including testing conducted using sequencing technology, could inform reproductive decisions. Thus far unacknowledged are the out-of-pocket expenses often associated with genomics-enabled reproductive planning. These expenses will render this benefit of medical technology inaccessible to many people. No word currently exists for the mistaken assumption that the typical person has significant financial resources or the construction of policies and practices with that assumption baked in. In this essay, I propose the term "plutonormativity" to illuminate these often unacknowledged inequities. I then show how plutonormative thinking is operating in one particular context: access to reproductive planning within current discussions of the benefits of the genetic testing.
Identifiers
39040521PMC11261900What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.