Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39040517›Full record

ArticleEthnography2021

'Team ethnography visual maps': Methods for identifying the ethnographic object in multiple sites of fieldwork.

Stephen Parkin, Louise Locock, Catherine Montgomery, Alison Chisholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnography, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen ParkinInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1621-0945
Louise LocockHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Catherine MontgomeryCentre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK.
Alison ChisholmDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 14/156/06Wellcome Trust 209519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Team ethnography is becoming more popular in research. However, there is currently limited understanding of how multiple ethnographers working together actually share their experiences of conducting team ethnography. There is also an associated lack of explanation regarding how evidence and conclusions are drawn from such collective endeavour. This article attempts to address this absence of detail regarding the practice and conduct of team ethnography. In the following account, the authors present details of the design, development and application of 'team ethnography visual maps' and the collaborative reflexivity that took place within 'team ethnography data sessions' that were each embedded within a mixed methods study of frontline services located in six different National Health Service Trusts throughout England (UK). After a presentation of the ethnographic methods and analyses that occurred as part of team ethnography, they are then discussed in terms of their applied and academic value from a methodological perspective.

Indexed as

focused ethnographyNational Health Service (NHS England)qualitative health researchteam ethnographyteam ethnography data sessionsteam ethnography visual maps

Identifiers

PMID39040517
PMCPMC7616273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.